Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Platforms
PCXboxPlayStationNintendo
Games
ActionStrategyRole Playing GamesSimulatorsSport Games

Game Forum / Role Playing Games / Warcraft / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

GLIDER

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Joeyjoe - 22 May 2008 03:26 GMT
anyone els get banned?
Jamie Kahn Genet - 22 May 2008 03:49 GMT
> anyone els get banned?

No, we can spell which saved us.
Signature

If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

Timothy Alcorn - 22 May 2008 06:12 GMT
> anyone els get banned?
Only the cheaters got banned, finally!
Palindrome - 22 May 2008 09:53 GMT
>anyone els get banned?

No.  In here we aren't incompetent, inept cretins.

From your pitiful excuse of a sentence, I assume you got banned?
Excellent - I hope you lost shitloads of characters, gold and gear.

Good job Blizzard!

Palindrome
Palindrome - 22 May 2008 09:55 GMT
>anyone els get banned?

That reminds me... I must pop into the Glider forums to take the piss
and enjoy all the weeping and gnashing of teeth.  It's usually
hilarious  :D

Palindrome
Ed - 22 May 2008 10:39 GMT
>>anyone els get banned?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Palindrome

Lol, i did, its hilarious. Lots of them gonne quit wow forever, others are
trying to sell there gliderkeys;-)))
Mwuhahaha, go Blizz

grts Ed
lzy@gmail.com - 22 May 2008 12:02 GMT
Ed wtote:

>Lol, i did, its hilarious. Lots of them gonne >quit wow forever, others are
>trying to sell there gliderkeys;-)))
>Mwuhahaha, go Blizz

Sorry to hear that. I myself tend to play as
simply as possible. My only addon is the one which shows coordinates...

-Lzy (L70 Hunter)
Pete B - 22 May 2008 13:47 GMT
> Ed wtote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Sorry to hear that. I myself tend to play as
> simply as possible. My only addon is the one which shows coordinates...

You are sorry to hear cheaters have been kicked out?
mbgaski@gmail.com - 22 May 2008 14:52 GMT
On May 22, 7:02 am, l...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ed wtote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Sorry to hear that. I myself tend to play as
> simply as possible. My only addon is the one which shows coordinates...

That's not really relevant though.  Blizzard doesn't care how
elaborate your addons get so long as they work within their provided
LUA framework (which virtually everything people reference as an
addon).  If an addon comes around that they thing does a little too
much (the original Decursive for example), they'll change the LUA
language to make that addon not work.  You won't get banned for it.

When they ban things like this, they are banning people using external
EXECUTABLE programs to modify the game works (usually to automate
play).

So, you're safe, but so is the next guy running 250 regular addons.
Heck I run between 100 and 150 of them myself and I escaped teh ban
hammer, because they were all legit addons.

Mike
PV - 22 May 2008 15:45 GMT
>So, you're safe, but so is the next guy running 250 regular addons.
>Heck I run between 100 and 150 of them myself and I escaped teh ban
>hammer, because they were all legit addons.

You didn't escape the banhammer - it doesn't apply to you because you did
nothing wrong. Addons are part of the game. *
Signature

* PV   something like badgers--something like lizards--and something
      like corkscrews.

PV - 22 May 2008 13:21 GMT
>Lol, i did, its hilarious. Lots of them gonne quit wow forever, others are
>trying to sell there gliderkeys;-)))

The funniest thing are all the ones who say they're going to Age of Conan.
One might almost suspect that this is what blizzard wanted to happen - fire
all your a.shole customers and have them wreck the new game.

Someone has already asked when glider will work on AoC. Gods, you can't
play the game like it's supposed to be even ONCE? *
Signature

* PV   something like badgers--something like lizards--and something
      like corkscrews.

Xymmie - 22 May 2008 13:55 GMT
>>Lol, i did, its hilarious. Lots of them gonne quit wow forever, others are
>>trying to sell there gliderkeys;-)))
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Someone has already asked when glider will work on AoC. Gods, you can't
> play the game like it's supposed to be even ONCE? *

But-but-but---you mean when a game says "x hours of gameplay" you're *not*
supposed to try to beat it in a fraction of the time and brag to all your
friends?  Who knew???

Xymmie
lcpltom - 22 May 2008 14:08 GMT
> >>Lol, i did, its hilarious. Lots of them gonne quit wow forever, others are
> >>trying to sell there gliderkeys;-)))
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Xymmie

I can just see some of these guys waiting for an AoC glider to be
released before they ever buy AoC.  Then on day 1, install the game,
create a character, fire up glider, and walk away.

I really don't understand the point of paying for 2 services in
relation to 1 game that you are not playing.
mbgaski@gmail.com - 22 May 2008 14:55 GMT
> The funniest thing are all the ones who say they're going to Age of Conan.
> One might almost suspect that this is what blizzard wanted to happen - fire
> all your a.shole customers and have them wreck the new game.
>
> Someone has already asked when glider will work on AoC. Gods, you can't
> play the game like it's supposed to be even ONCE? *

Furthering the funny-ness is that AoC is already booting cheaters
too.  They don't want them any more than Blizzard does.  Speaking of
"that other game" - I was mighty tempted to try it out yesterday.  I
had it in my hands but talked myself out of it.  Going to do my best
not to pick it up, but I guess it'll depend on how things look a few
months in (going to see whether or not people are still playing it or
if it makes a splash and then dies out).

Mike
Mark (newsgroups) - 22 May 2008 15:20 GMT
On May 22, 2:55 pm, "mbga...@gmail.com" <mbga...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > The funniest thing are all the ones who say they're going to Age of Conan.
> > One might almost suspect that this is what blizzard wanted to happen - fire
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> months in (going to see whether or not people are still playing it or
> if it makes a splash and then dies out).

I had a look at the website yesterday and must admit the screenshots
didn't appeal to me.

Still, depending on the cost of the game and if the first month is
free, I may give it a try. Would be nice to be in an MMO again where
you don't have to spend a few months playing single player mode every
time you try a new class.
Trooper - 22 May 2008 15:38 GMT
In article <11a18311-a178-46d6-a40c-
58cd9e90ed9d@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, marknewsgroups@yahoo.com
says...

> Still, depending on the cost of the game and if the first month is
> free, I may give it a try. Would be nice to be in an MMO again where
> you don't have to spend a few months playing single player mode every
> time you try a new class.

£25.99 in the uk with first month free, honestly I'm not expecting to
subscribe beyond the first free month, but we shall see...

T.
steve.kaye - 22 May 2008 15:51 GMT
On 22 May, 15:20, "Mark (newsgroups)" <marknewsgro...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On May 22, 2:55 pm, "mbga...@gmail.com" <mbga...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Furthering the funny-ness is that AoC is already booting cheaters
> > too.  They don't want them any more than Blizzard does.  Speaking of
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I had a look at the website yesterday and must admit the screenshots
> didn't appeal to me.

The characters look a bit too gritty for my taste but I really like
the look of the scenery.

steve.kaye
Palindrome - 22 May 2008 16:47 GMT
>>Lol, i did, its hilarious. Lots of them gonne quit wow forever, others are
>>trying to sell there gliderkeys;-)))
>
>The funniest thing are all the ones who say they're going to Age of Conan.
>One might almost suspect that this is what blizzard wanted to happen - fire
>all your a.shole customers and have them wreck the new game.

That seems to be the current theory from what some people are saying
on the O-Boards.  A cunning wheeze, if true  :)

>Someone has already asked when glider will work on AoC. Gods, you can't
>play the game like it's supposed to be even ONCE? *

I know.  They haven't even played it, yet they want to start botting
and farming.  Useless tossers.

Palindrome
Sean - 23 May 2008 18:53 GMT
> >>Lol, i did, its hilarious. Lots of them gonne quit wow forever, others are
> >>trying to sell there gliderkeys;-)))
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Palindrome

Not to sound like a dick, but I'm am glad they are being agressive to
people using bots. Conversely, it would be nice to see people using
the G14 keyboards be given a fair shake and investigated properly;
that being said, if they ARE using the G-whatever keyboard to "bot"
certain tasks, then they should have known better...
Villy Vonka - 22 May 2008 13:19 GMT
> That reminds me... I must pop into the Glider forums to take the piss
> and enjoy all the weeping and gnashing of teeth.  It's usually
> hilarious  :D

LOL!  Thanks for the tip, great read I particularly enjoyed the one
where they were banned half-way through a Shattered Halls run!

And the muppet who announced that he was boycotting Blizzard.  Erm, I
think it was Blizz doing the boycotting there!

What strikes me is the victim mentality and attitude that Blizz is
being unfair and picking on them, in much the same way as you'll never
find a guilty man in prison.  Every one seems to be desperately trying
to justify or legitimise their activities and as usual, everybody but
themselves is to blame ;)

Anyway, good riddance to 'em.

Cheers
Nibbler - 22 May 2008 13:29 GMT
>"Villy Vonka" <news@villyvonka.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:27524378-914f-4ad8-a03a-
>LOL!  Thanks for the tip, great read I particularly enjoyed the one
>where they were banned half-way through a Shattered Halls run!

>And the muppet who announced that he was boycotting Blizzard.  Erm, I
>think it was Blizz doing the boycotting there!

>What strikes me is the victim mentality and attitude that Blizz is
>being unfair and picking on them, in much the same way as you'll never
>find a guilty man in prison.  Every one seems to be desperately trying
>to justify or legitimise their activities and as usual, everybody but
>themselves is to blame ;)

>Anyway, good riddance to 'em.

>Cheers

I did like the post "well it's blizzard's own fault, how can anyone ever get
an epic mount at 5000g".

Easy, by not having the IQ of a fish.
Palindrome - 22 May 2008 17:03 GMT
>I did like the post "well it's blizzard's own fault, how can anyone ever get
>an epic mount at 5000g".
>
>Easy, by not having the IQ of a fish.

Well said.  The dailies provide substantial amounts of gold, and one
of my sons can make a couple of thousand gold a week, with no trouble
at all.  That's including the fact that my kids' WoW games are set to
shut off at a reasonable time at night. He goes to college during the
day, has a gaming curfew at night, yet he can make THAT much in the
limited time he gets without having to resort to botting.

Glider users are lazy, inept cheaters who fantasize that they "have a
life", and, sad little twats that they are, they BELIEVE it  :D

Palindrome
Nibbler - 22 May 2008 17:20 GMT
>>I did like the post "well it's blizzard's own fault, how can anyone ever
>>get
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Glider users are lazy, inept cheaters who fantasize that they "have a
> life", and, sad little twats that they are, they BELIEVE it  :D

I gave up doing dailies and farming ages ago, when I realised I could make
all my money off AH.

All of those individual marks of sargeras for under 1g each stack em up to
250 and sell them all for 325g bad-a-bing profit, motes, signets, buying
rares and adding 5g to them, linen cloth, ores. Buying metals and stuffing
them in the bank when someone has a brain wave to offload 50 stacks into AH
and everyone tries to crash the market on him, buy them up put them in the
bank and wait for the rainy day to appear. Money is easy to make and playing
AH looking for the bargain (not including using bottom scanner if you want
to be lazy, but legal) is alot of fun, and to me more fun than grinding.
I've yet to see any of these free gold guides or lazy bastards who bot, make
anywhere near the money I can on AH, christ even doing dailies which takes
no time at all brings in loads of gold and a few of them have BoJ chance as
well, not gonna get any epics easier than that, and glider won't do it for
them.
lcpltom - 22 May 2008 18:00 GMT
> >>I did like the post "well it's blizzard's own fault, how can anyone ever
> >>get
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> well, not gonna get any epics easier than that, and glider won't do it for
> them.

The only thing glider is really good for, as far as gold generation,
is setting it in a place to farm specific items.  Such as the marks of
sargeras you mentioned.  Set a glider controlled character in a place
in Outland with demons and let the bot do its work.  Hours later they
come back with a ton of marks to sell.  Same thing can be done with
other stuff like primals, signets, ethereum prison keys.  Then there
are other stuff like grinding certain beast mobs for meat, which can
be cooked and sold.  I don't know if glider has it, but wow mimic
advertised a fishing bot, allowing someone to park a character in a
spot to fish for hours.  Fishing can bring in tons of gold and having
a bot taking the monotony out of it makes it all the more easier.

Mind you, I'm not condoning the use of a bot, nor do I use a bot, just
pointing out that their bots can in fact make them plenty of gold
without doing dailies or playing the AH game.  Not to mention, with
all the grinding those bots do, they have an increased chance of
finding a mob that has an epic world drop, which can instantly bring
in a lot of gold.
PV - 22 May 2008 22:13 GMT
>without doing dailies or playing the AH game.  Not to mention, with
>all the grinding those bots do, they have an increased chance of
>finding a mob that has an epic world drop, which can instantly bring
>in a lot of gold.

And then you get banned, making it even *more* pointless. *
Signature

* PV   something like badgers--something like lizards--and something
      like corkscrews.

mbgaski@gmail.com - 22 May 2008 18:29 GMT
> at all.  That's including the fact that my kids' WoW games are set to
> shut off at a reasonable time at night. He goes to college during the
> day, has a gaming curfew at night, yet he can make THAT much in the
> limited time he gets without having to resort to botting.

Um, this is off topic, but if your son is in college don't you think
he's a little old for you to be setting limits on his bedtime or
computer use?  Unless you're in a different country or something and
college means something different there.

Mike
Magnus, Robot Fighter - 22 May 2008 19:04 GMT
>> at all.  That's including the fact that my kids' WoW games are set to
>> shut off at a reasonable time at night. He goes to college during the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Mike

I thought that too then (shrug) if he's gonna be living under his
roof, it's his rules.
mbgaski@gmail.com - 22 May 2008 19:44 GMT
> I thought that too then (shrug) if he's gonna be living under his
> roof, it's his rules.

While certainly true, that doesn't mean that any and everything that
said parent can possibly demand is right.  If he demanded that he come
home every day, stand on one foot, and jump up and down singing I'm a
little teapot under penalty of getting kicked out I'm sure we'd all
agree that it's the dad's legal right to enforce this, but that he'd
be insane for doing so ;).

That said, in the other post there Mr Palindrome has said that his son
is still 16, so that is a lil more understandable.  Still a bit strict
in my eyes, but not quite on the same level as telling an 18+ year old
adult that he can't play video games past a certain hour :).

Mike
Palindrome - 22 May 2008 20:21 GMT
>> I thought that too then (shrug) if he's gonna be living under his
>> roof, it's his rules.

Actually, he doesn't live under my roof, because of a divorce, and
prior to me setting an evening deadline he'd tend to stay up playing
until 1am+, raiding every night, and then his mother would have a hell
of a time waking him up and getting his a.s off to school.  I'd
trusted him to be reasonable in my absence, and had let him use his
own judgment as to when to call it a night, and he took advantage.
That was around 8 months ago, when he was still 15, and he's only very
recently turned 16. My other son is 14.  I want no strife between me,
my ex-wife and also their tutors/teachers because they are too tired
to do their studies.  

>That said, in the other post there Mr Palindrome has said that his son
>is still 16, so that is a lil more understandable.  Still a bit strict
>in my eyes, but not quite on the same level as telling an 18+ year old
>adult that he can't play video games past a certain hour :).

Not really that strict. My sons and I discussed the "curfew" and we
all agreed it was the best thing to do.  Heck, they can start playing
at 7am should they wish to do so, and continue to 10.30pm on weekdays
non-stop - neither me or nor their mother have a problem with that, if
their homework is done and they've helped their mother with a chore or
two.  They both have a 15-hour daily session available to them which
is more than ample - hell, even I wouldn't play that much  :)   Friday
and Saturday nights there's no limits set anyway, and my sons can
crash out asleep on the keyboard if they so wish, heh.  Once they hit
the magic 18 years old, they get free rein, they pay for their own
accounts, and hopefully they've learnt along the way that a couple of
boundaries is no bad thing.

Anyway, enough of this.  This isn't parenting class  ;)

Palindrome
Pete B - 24 May 2008 15:48 GMT
> Anyway, enough of this.  This isn't parenting class  ;)

I'm not sure i'd want to play that class! ;)
Palindrome - 24 May 2008 15:51 GMT
>> Anyway, enough of this.  This isn't parenting class  ;)
>
>I'm not sure i'd want to play that class! ;)

lol  :D

Palindrome
Palindrome - 22 May 2008 19:07 GMT
>> at all.  That's including the fact that my kids' WoW games are set to
>> shut off at a reasonable time at night. He goes to college during the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>computer use?  Unless you're in a different country or something and
>college means something different there.

Not college as in "adult college" - he's still school age.  Kids here
in the UK can go to there at 16 instead of staying in a normal school
for another couple of years.  I'm not setting limits on his bedtime :D
He can do as he pleases after WoW shuts down at 10.30 at night, during
the week, but I won't have WoW keeping him up at all hours, when he
has to get up early.  Weekends and holidays are pretty much open all
hours.should he want to indulge, but he's a sensible lad. When he hits
18, he can do as he sees fit, being a legal adult at that point.  Then
HE pays for the account  :)

Palindrome
PV - 22 May 2008 15:41 GMT
>And the muppet who announced that he was boycotting Blizzard.  Erm, I
>think it was Blizz doing the boycotting there!

Yep.

>What strikes me is the victim mentality and attitude that Blizz is
>being unfair and picking on them, in much the same way as you'll never
>find a guilty man in prison.  Every one seems to be desperately trying

There's one particular idiot who thinks that WoW needs them, that without
botters the economy would run out of control. It's amazing what
rationalization cheaters and scumbags will come up with to defend their
activities. *
Signature

* PV   something like badgers--something like lizards--and something
      like corkscrews.

Palindrome - 22 May 2008 16:55 GMT
>> That reminds me... I must pop into the Glider forums to take the piss
>> and enjoy all the weeping and gnashing of teeth.  It's usually
>> hilarious  :D
>
>LOL!  Thanks for the tip, great read I particularly enjoyed the one
>where they were banned half-way through a Shattered Halls run!

You're welcome :)  I really enjoyed it when they banhammered them the
last time.

>And the muppet who announced that he was boycotting Blizzard.  Erm, I
>think it was Blizz doing the boycotting there!

Typical of the stunted mentality on there.

>What strikes me is the victim mentality and attitude that Blizz is
>being unfair and picking on them, in much the same way as you'll never
>find a guilty man in prison.  Every one seems to be desperately trying
>to justify or legitimise their activities and as usual, everybody but
>themselves is to blame ;)

Yes, that same old cliche about "doing it because I have a life and
don't want to grind" makes me laugh.  If they had sufficient *friends*
to group with, the levels absolutely fly by!  They are mostly sad
little loners who have no alternative but to have a robot play for
them while they go about their lonely little lives.

>Anyway, good riddance to 'em.

'Damn right.

Palindrome
twk - 22 May 2008 13:54 GMT
> >anyone els get banned?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Palindrome

I did just that for the first time. I was amazed at the ones who took it
quite well. And what really made my day was finding out Glider is a
subscription service. Some of these cheater/losers paid for a year in
advance, and got banned in the second month.

Twist that knife, add salt to taste.

I forgot to see what one year of glider costs.

Signature

Hypanthia, Night Elf, Shadow Priest, Enchantress/Herbalist.
Darkfury, Gnome, Rogue, Miner/Jewel Crafter.
Py, Dwarf, Hunter, Herbalist/Alchemist.
Bigpotpie, Tauren, Hunter, Herbalist/Alchemist.

Pete B - 22 May 2008 13:42 GMT
> anyone els get banned?

All got the ban hammer! *g*
Magnus, Robot Fighter - 22 May 2008 15:30 GMT
>> anyone els get banned?
>
>All got the ban hammer! *g*

wtf is glider?
morag - 22 May 2008 15:57 GMT
> >In article <4834d9f3$0$15205$607ed...@cv.net>, joliver328
> >@YahooNOSPAM.com says...
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> wtf is glider?

I haven't researched it in depth but, according to several news
stories I have read, it's a software product that allows the user to
copy the game into their RAM (which Blizzard states is a copyright
violation) and then Glider executes against this copy, which allows
the player to play without playing.   I imagine it's programmable to a
certain extent.

I just think it's pathetic that so many people can't even be bothered
to play a *game* themselves.
Bruce - 22 May 2008 16:55 GMT
>I just think it's pathetic that so many people can't even be bothered
>to play a *game* themselves.

/agree

They have paid to buy the WoW software, are paying a monthly
subscription, plus whatever they pay/paid for Glider, to NOT play the
game.
... and they call us legit players tools  LOL.

I was hanging out in Blizzard's CSF as the first QQ on the ban-wave
was posted. I'm still LMAO  :D
Joeyjoe - 22 May 2008 23:48 GMT
well. i did get banned but im not all that upset. i spent 70 days /played
lol. its time for a break for wow. I botted because i didnt want to do the
entire levling process to just play another 70. oh well its not that big of
a deal. im glad the cheaters got banned. just wished they would stop
spamming all thoese gold /w.. im going to go try AoC now. (not botting ever
again lol)

as for everyone bashing me and cursing.. how mature are you?? i was  just
asking a question.

>>I just think it's pathetic that so many people can't even be bothered
>>to play a *game* themselves.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I was hanging out in Blizzard's CSF as the first QQ on the ban-wave
> was posted. I'm still LMAO  :D
Pete B - 23 May 2008 02:02 GMT
> >> anyone els get banned?
> >
> >All got the ban hammer! *g*
>
> wtf is glider?

It is a "bot" - a program which can be set up to manipulate world of
warcraft (NOT an addon, those are ok by blizzard - but an external
program you start before you start the game) - it then remote controls
your characters and has it running around in an area killing mobs all
night (while you sleep) - all day (while you are at work) - all eveniing
(while you are at the cinema) - and have you leveled when you come back
in the evening.

Blizzard does NOT want people to do that, and has added code to the game
which tries to scan for this - those who make the bots keep trying to
avoid being detected - so instead of working on the expansion they have
people trying to defeat the cheaters (and gold sellers etc)
Kit Walker - 23 May 2008 11:40 GMT
>> wtf is glider?
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> avoid being detected - so instead of working on the expansion they have
> people trying to defeat the cheaters (and gold sellers etc)

How would Blizzard's remote software tell whether i was pressing the keys or
my Glider is doing it (mind u i dont do it), isn't blizz's software making a
huge asumption? what does it do? engage in pst's with suspected bots? and if
no answer, Banned?
hmmm, no way, they are guessing, just using s-ware for extrapolation. Maybe
if a toon is too 'long' in one place? no pst's during play? just sounds too
easy, maybe they just scan ur HD for Glider?

Kit Walker
Urbin - 23 May 2008 12:07 GMT
> >> wtf is glider?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>  if a toon is too 'long' in one place? no pst's during play? just sounds too
>  easy, maybe they just scan ur HD for Glider?

When you "accept" the EULA/TOS after every patch, you agree to let them
install and run the "Warden" which is a piece of software running on your PC
trying to catch botting/modification software.

Fairly reliable, too, if the QQ on the glider and CSF forums is any
indication ;-)

Cheers
Urbin

Signature

Dun Morogh-EU (PvE)
Urbin   (70), Dwarven Hunter    | Surana  (24), Draenei Mage
Mymule  (70), Gnomish Warlock   | Juran   (33), Nightelven Druid
Sunh    (70), Nightelven Priest | Gera    (26), Human Paladin

Ed - 23 May 2008 13:11 GMT
> How would Blizzard's remote software tell whether i was pressing the keys
> or my Glider is doing it (mind u i dont do it), isn't blizz's software
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Kit Walker

I did read some posts about people using linux, or a programmable keyboard
who also got band.
They didn't get a chance to explain to blizz what was going on, there is no
way of negotiating.
Even friends of them who posted on the official warcraft forums couldn't
post anything anymore after a while.

Think this is just a thing of the times we live in. big companies like
telecom for example get costumers in a very agressive way.
The ones with problems have the hardest time getting things solved, there is
almost no kind of costumer service. its just easyer, and more important
cheaper to not have a big
and expensive helpdesk. just ignore the complaints and get more clients.
Those who take the step to get a lawyer are rare.Because the
ammount of money involved does not cover the expense or the effort they have
to put in.

I'm not a glider user myself, in fact, i hate everything that smells like
cheating. Many online games i used to play before wow got destroyed by
cheaters.
But I agree with Walker that some software detecting program is not flawles,
and might get innocent people banned.
Imagen it happens to you, and you have no way defending yourself or get your
account back,.....

grts bahaal
Ed - 23 May 2008 13:16 GMT
Here's a link of a Linux user who got band and the communication with Blizz.
http://infernix.net/wowban/

grts Ed
Pete B - 23 May 2008 14:08 GMT
> Here's a link of a Linux user who got band and the communication with Blizz.
> http://infernix.net/wowban/

Ah, someone who thinks having his character train skills while he
watches tv isn't a bannable offense *g*
mbgaski@gmail.com - 23 May 2008 14:17 GMT
> Here's a link of a Linux user who got band and the communication with Blizz.http://infernix.net/wowban/
>
> grts Ed

That's from 2 years ago, and virtually every person back then that was
banned for using WoW via Wine on Linux got their account back.  The
Warden hasn't picked up Wine as being a hack in ages now.  It's
perfectly safe to play on Linux with Wine these days.

Mike
Urbin - 23 May 2008 15:30 GMT
> > Here's a link of a Linux user who got band and the communication with Blizz.http://infernix.net/wowban/
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>  Warden hasn't picked up Wine as being a hack in ages now.  It's
>  perfectly safe to play on Linux with Wine these days.

Apparently, as Pete wrote, the link is about a guy using a programmable
keyboard to level weapon skills while watching tv and not about cedega/wine
being falsely marked by warden. the latter being something they rectified,
the former still being a bannable offense.

Cheers
Urbin, very happy with the latest banwave

Signature

Dun Morogh-EU (PvE)
Urbin   (70), Dwarven Hunter    | Surana  (24), Draenei Mage
Mymule  (70), Gnomish Warlock   | Juran   (33), Nightelven Druid
Sunh    (70), Nightelven Priest | Gera    (26), Human Paladin

PV - 27 May 2008 16:07 GMT
>Here's a link of a Linux user who got band and the communication with Blizz.
>http://infernix.net/wowban/

So what? *
Signature

* PV   something like badgers--something like lizards--and something
      like corkscrews.

Urbin - 23 May 2008 13:40 GMT
> > How would Blizzard's remote software tell whether i was pressing the keys
> > or my Glider is doing it (mind u i dont do it), isn't blizz's software
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>  who posted on the official warcraft forums couldn't post anything anymore
>  after a while.

You will find that during the last glider-banwave, a lot of Linux users
using Cedega (sp?) to run WoW under Linux got banned by mistake ("false
positive" is the proper term here). As far as I know, most of them got their
accounts back and the warden was adjusted. From what I read on the official
CSF forums during the past days, no linux users got hit by the banhammer
this time.

Also, the Blizz posters on the CSF forums posted the link to get in touch
with Account Admin for people who were of the opinion that they were
unjustly banned. As far as I know Blizzard will review such cases in their
logs and revoke a ban if it was unjustified. Of course, with 300'000+ people
banned, the backlog on this path might be a nasty surprise for the true
victims of a false positive at the moment...

>  Think this is just a thing of the times we live in. [snip] there is
>  almost no kind of costumer service. its just easyer, and more important
>  cheaper to not have a big and expensive helpdesk. just ignore the
>  complaints and get more clients.  Those who take the step to get a lawyer
>  are rare.Because the ammount of money involved does not cover the expense
>  or the effort they have to put in.

I agree with you in principle. And I can't say whether Blizzard fit in with
the majority or whether they are the nice exception to the rule or not.
However, I have read posts by people who were banned by mistake and got
their accounts back and the time lost credited to their account, so at least
their revision process seems to work.

And yes, I saw your other post with the link to the guy banned for running
linux but did not follow the link to read the post. I don't know if he is
the unlucky exception who did not get his account back during the last ban
wave, or if he did but only later and posted his stuff beforehand or if he
was the one linux user that did cheat in addition to playing on linux or...
I am just saying, there is evidence that Blizzard corrects bans that were
unjustified.

>  But I agree with Walker that some software detecting program is not
>  flawles, and might get innocent people banned. Imagen it happens to you,
>  and you have no way defending yourself or get your account back,.....

But you do have a way. Get in touch with Account Admin and they will
investigate your case.

As I was saying, I don't have first hand information on this, maybe someone
else can enlighten us to what it is like to interact with AA...

Cheers
Urbin

Signature

Dun Morogh-EU (PvE)
Urbin   (70), Dwarven Hunter    | Surana  (24), Draenei Mage
Mymule  (70), Gnomish Warlock   | Juran   (33), Nightelven Druid
Sunh    (70), Nightelven Priest | Gera    (26), Human Paladin

Pete B - 23 May 2008 14:16 GMT
> And yes, I saw your other post with the link to the guy banned for running
> linux but did not follow the link to read the post.

I did. He used a programmable keyboard to have his character train
weaponskils by hitting a lowlever critter (which healed itself over and
over) over and over while he watched movies.
Urbin - 23 May 2008 15:27 GMT
>  In article <slrng3deqd.3f6.urbin@stinky.trash.net>,
>  urbin@invalid.invalid says...
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>  weaponskils by hitting a lowlever critter (which healed itself over and
>  over) over and over while he watched movies.

Thanks. Well, then he was correctly banned for use of a programmable
keyboard and not incorrectly for running WoW under Linux.

Cheers
Urbin

Signature

Dun Morogh-EU (PvE)
Urbin   (70), Dwarven Hunter    | Surana  (24), Draenei Mage
Mymule  (70), Gnomish Warlock   | Juran   (33), Nightelven Druid
Sunh    (70), Nightelven Priest | Gera    (26), Human Paladin

Pete B - 23 May 2008 14:01 GMT
> How would Blizzard's remote software tell whether i was pressing the keys or
> my Glider is doing it (mind u i dont do it), isn't blizz's software making a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> if a toon is too 'long' in one place? no pst's during play? just sounds too
> easy, maybe they just scan ur HD for Glider?

As someone else mentioned, there are routines (part of the program)
which is refered to as "Warden" which has nothing to do with the game,
but scans memory for "something" (the something being a secret kept by
Blizzard) - much like a virus scanner it knows about certain threats and
moitors the memory areas used by the game to make sure other programs
don't monitor that - it also makes some guesses outside of what it
"knows" - the Warden has the ability to close an account if it finds
something suspcious. What seems to happen then is: If the user doesn't
complain or enquire, the account just stays closed. Usually though
people will write to the overburden accouting department (average wait:
8 days) complaining about it, claiming they are innocent - and then
humans will take over and analyze the logs. Most people don't realise
how much is logged (even your emotes are logged - you can get a temp ban
for spamming emotes). And for instance if they see you have been in the
same zone for 24 hours killing mobs every 5 seconds all the time - they
are probably not going to believe it was you.

Sometimes when they can't find what they consider proof they have
reopened the account again. Of course they only close or ban an
*account* - not the credit card, so you could just start another account
right away on the same card.
Urbin - 23 May 2008 15:29 GMT
>  Sometimes when they can't find what they consider proof they have
>  reopened the account again. Of course they only close or ban an
>  *account* - not the credit card, so you could just start another account
>  right away on the same card.

Actually, in the current ban wave, they seem to have banned all accounts
paid for by an offending credit card to catch people having two accounts,
one to bot and one with their bona fide chars on (something suggested on the
glider forums to get around risking valuable main chars).

I don't know whether these bans concern only existing accounts or whether
they will also refuse to let you open new accounts with such a CC...

Cheers
Urbin

Signature

Dun Morogh-EU (PvE)
Urbin   (70), Dwarven Hunter    | Surana  (24), Draenei Mage
Mymule  (70), Gnomish Warlock   | Juran   (33), Nightelven Druid
Sunh    (70), Nightelven Priest | Gera    (26), Human Paladin

Jason Tinling - 23 May 2008 17:02 GMT
> I don't know whether these bans concern only existing accounts or whether
> they will also refuse to let you open new accounts with such a CC...
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> --

There was a post on the CSF forums, where the guy admitted to botting
and accepting his ban, inquiring if he could use the same CC to open a
new account.  According to blue, as long as he doesn't bot on the new
acocunt, he has no issues, suggesting that while they did appear to
ban accounts connected by CC, they have not black-listed the CC's
themselves.
mbgaski@gmail.com - 24 May 2008 01:19 GMT
> There was a post on the CSF forums, where the guy admitted to botting
> and accepting his ban, inquiring if he could use the same CC to open a
> new account.  According to blue, as long as he doesn't bot on the new
> acocunt, he has no issues, suggesting that while they did appear to
> ban accounts connected by CC, they have not black-listed the CC's
> themselves.

Probably more trouble than it's worth for them to bother blacklisting
CC #'s.  Call the company and say you lost it and they'll have you one
with a new number in 3-5 days.

MIke
Pete B - 24 May 2008 15:51 GMT
> >  Sometimes when they can't find what they consider proof they have
> >  reopened the account again. Of course they only close or ban an
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I don't know whether these bans concern only existing accounts or whether
> they will also refuse to let you open new accounts with such a CC...

Well i just know what i read, in an interview i think, where some high
up blizzard'er said "we do not ban credit cards, only accounts". But I
guess if they find that an account has been hacking, it would make sense
to check out other accounts on that credit card. And of course if your
bot char has been sending a steady stream of goods to your other account
they are probably both toast *g*
PV - 27 May 2008 16:05 GMT
>How would Blizzard's remote software tell whether i was pressing the keys or
>my Glider is doing it (mind u i dont do it), isn't blizz's software making a
>huge asumption? what does it do? engage in pst's with suspected bots? and if
>no answer, Banned?

Outside of banwaves, they do exactly what you say there - if someone
reports a bot, they "play with it".

From my reading of the glider forum, it kind of goes like this - they
teleport the botting character to somewhere far away from their 'patrol
route'. Generally one of three things happen then: 1) A legitimate player
is confused, but they control their character properly and move on. 2) The
glider's protections instantly log off the character. This happening over
and over is as good as 3) The character runs into a piece of scenery and
gets stuck. Supposedly if a botter has been very thorough it's possible for
them to detect the stuck condition and *maybe* get back on track
mechanically, but if the GM picks someplace really obscure or heavily
overgrown, you're gonna be detectably running in place and banging into
things like a blind drunk.

GMs will also whisper suspected botters, but the software apparently
screeches a loud warning when this happens which would give the botter a
chance to run to the keyboard or log off. It would only catch someone who's
botting when not near the computer.

>hmmm, no way, they are guessing, just using s-ware for extrapolation. Maybe
>if a toon is too 'long' in one place? no pst's during play? just sounds too
>easy, maybe they just scan ur HD for Glider?

They can do software detection too. There's really no bulletproof way to
hide it, regardless of what the developer will tell you. Even rootkits are
readily detectable if you know what you're doing. And you can bet that
there's someone at blizzard that has a copy of glider the moment an update
is released, so they know *exactly* how it tries to hide itself. *
Signature

* PV   something like badgers--something like lizards--and something
      like corkscrews.

PV - 27 May 2008 15:54 GMT
>Blizzard does NOT want people to do that, and has added code to the game
>which tries to scan for this - those who make the bots keep trying to
>avoid being detected - so instead of working on the expansion they have
>people trying to defeat the cheaters (and gold sellers etc)

It's my opinion that the attempts to hide glider have never actually
worked - they just make it look like that so they can entrap lots of
cheaters at once, after collecting subscription money from them as a
disincentive. This "mercury" character is just some guy - he's not figuring
out how to hide his code in 48 hours after a ban. It's just that they're
turning off the detection code (or not acting on it) between ban waves.

Blizzard has no good reason to terminate trial accounts being glided. On
the other hand, if they wait until you're in the game for cash and THEN do
it, you get screwed for cheating and they get financial compensation for
it. *
Signature

* PV   something like badgers--something like lizards--and something
      like corkscrews.

L - 23 May 2008 14:16 GMT
> anyone els get banned?

YES, thankfully. This was a massive ban wave by Blizzard to get rid of all
the folks too damned lazy/stupid/"with too little time" to actually play the
game they purchased and subscribed to.

GJ Blizz! Way to go!
Joeyjoe - 31 May 2008 15:04 GMT
>> anyone els get banned?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> GJ Blizz! Way to go!

Relax "L" go take a Chill pill

lol
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.