PING Peter [AGHL] - a drool page for ya :o)

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

McG. - 17 Jan 2007 15:54 GMT

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814102076

This pair would rank 2nd highest under GeForce 8800 GTX 768 meg card.
This pair costs about the same as the one 8800 GTX 768.
McG.

Reply to this Message

Peter [AGHL] - 17 Jan 2007 16:27 GMT

> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814102076
>
> This pair would rank 2nd highest under GeForce 8800 GTX 768 meg card.
> This pair costs about the same as the one 8800 GTX 768.

Hehe nice :)

But sorry to inform you
ATI has decided to change their Crossfire setup
Special crossfire cards is no longer needed

You can get the general idea here
http://www.trustedreviews.com/graphics/review/2006/10/19/Sapphire-X1950-Pro/p2

- Peter

Signature

Hi! I'm a .signature *virus*!
Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!

Reply to this Message

McG. - 17 Jan 2007 16:48 GMT

>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814102076
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> - Peter

Hey, still evolving, great! That link I sent you shows that this pair
of X1950 XTX cards come in a briefcase with combo locks :o) These are
the standard 1 crossfire card and 1 regular card. I see the solder pads
for the plug that these ones don't come with.
My 'twins' are a year old now, and it's nice to see they still, run
right up there with the best of them.
If I get rich somehow, I might try that 8800 GTX 768 meg card!
McG.

Reply to this Message

Peter [AGHL] - 17 Jan 2007 17:27 GMT

> If I get rich somehow, I might try that 8800 GTX 768 meg card!

In a SLI config obviously

... LOL

- Peter

Signature

Hi! I'm a .signature *virus*!
Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!

Reply to this Message

McG. - 18 Jan 2007 01:53 GMT

>> If I get rich somehow, I might try that 8800 GTX 768 meg card!
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> - Peter

No need for that even with the 7800GTX. Sure won't be a need for it with
the 8800GTX :o)
McG.

Reply to this Message

Peter [AGHL] - 18 Jan 2007 09:10 GMT

McG. skrev:

> No need for that even with the 7800GTX. Sure won't be a need for it with
> the 8800GTX :o)

In a couple of years?

- Peter

Reply to this Message

McG. - 18 Jan 2007 10:56 GMT

> McG. skrev:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> - Peter

In a couple years they'll be past the 8800, 9900 and on to??? I'm sure
I'll find something :)
McG.

Reply to this Message

Ben Cottrell - 19 Jan 2007 00:44 GMT

>>McG. skrev:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> In a couple years they'll be past the 8800, 9900 and on to??? I'm sure
> I'll find something :)

ATI reached that problem back in 2003 ... I guess 10800 didn't look
"cool", so they opted for X800 instead :-)

Signature

Ben Cottrell AKA Bench

Reply to this Message

McG. - 19 Jan 2007 01:27 GMT

>>>McG. skrev:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> ATI reached that problem back in 2003 ... I guess 10800 didn't look
> "cool", so they opted for X800 instead :-)

Yeah, we'll enjoy picking on them too when they change schemes :)
McG.

Reply to this Message