What's it matter how/why the fish attacked. Steve Irwin died in the pursuit
of something he loved doing, IMHO, if you're gonna go, might as well be
doing something you enjoy.
> What's it matter how/why the fish attacked. Steve Irwin died in the pursuit
> of something he loved doing, IMHO, if you're gonna go, might as well be
> doing something you enjoy.
True, but that has nothing to do with the original point. Every
time I saw Irwin on TV he was doing something that was not
only needlessly dangerous but completely pointless as well
(e.g. forcing open the jaws of juvenile crocodiles, etc). Was
the audience supposed to learn something from that, or was it
just an ego exercise for Irwin?
The prior post had it exactly correct IMHO: the odds finally
caught up with him, and it was natural selection hard at work.
Thad - 08 Sep 2006 13:43 GMT
> True, but that has nothing to do with the original point. Every
> time I saw Irwin on TV he was doing something that was not
> only needlessly dangerous but completely pointless as well
> (e.g. forcing open the jaws of juvenile crocodiles, etc). Was
> the audience supposed to learn something from that, or was it
> just an ego exercise for Irwin?
I only watched it a couple of times and my conclusion was #2.
> The prior post had it exactly correct IMHO: the odds finally
> caught up with him, and it was natural selection hard at work.
Harsh, but true.
I really hate that he had his daughter with him when it happened.
---
Thad
G Hardy - 08 Sep 2006 21:55 GMT
> I really hate that he had his daughter with him when it happened.
I didn't know that! Where was she? In the water or the boat?
Lief - 09 Sep 2006 01:05 GMT
> > What's it matter how/why the fish attacked. Steve Irwin died in the pursuit
> > of something he loved doing, IMHO, if you're gonna go, might as well be
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> The prior post had it exactly correct IMHO: the odds finally
> caught up with him, and it was natural selection hard at work.
I think you got him wrong to be honest. Most people fear the animals he
worked with, he had no fear of them himself.
I believe he was trying to show them in a good light, rather than the bad,
which seems to follow any carnivore which isn't human.
G Hardy - 09 Sep 2006 21:59 GMT
> I believe he was trying to show them in a good light, rather than the bad,
> which seems to follow any carnivore which isn't human.
Yeah, but if he'd shown them in a bad light, the picture would be too dark
on TV.
I'll get me coat...
McGrandpa - 09 Sep 2006 23:50 GMT
>> What's it matter how/why the fish attacked. Steve Irwin died in the
>> pursuit
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> The prior post had it exactly correct IMHO: the odds finally
> caught up with him, and it was natural selection hard at work.
He was taping a show, he was in the water. It's all on tape. the
authorities have that, it is not released to the public. yet. The police
have said there was no 'harrassment' going on, no foul play at all. A ray
took off when Steve was swimming over, it lashed at him with its tail, the
barb struck him in the chest, Steve pulled the barb out himself, and died.
McG.
> What's it matter how/why the fish attacked. Steve Irwin died in the pursuit
> of something he loved doing, IMHO, if you're gonna go, might as well be
> doing something you enjoy.
Yeah - it'd have been kinda anti-climactic if he'd died of something
normal like cancer...
Civilian_Target