 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups Platforms PCXboxPlayStationNintendoGames ActionStrategyRole Playing GamesSimulatorsSport Games |
Game Forum / Action Games / Half Life 2 / July 2006Worst tech ideas of the 21st century . . .
No #1 - STEAM . . . I disagree with your number 1 slot, and would like to suggest the following: Muslim countries with nuclear power. >I disagree with your number 1 slot, and would like to suggest the >following: > > Muslim countries with nuclear power. What about Christian countries with nuclear power? Bush is just as convinced as the Ayatollahs that God is on his side and all other religions are evil, after all. ;)  SignatureJack of Hearts in The Eeeeevil Cabal (TINC...) E-mail - quake2lives AT gmail DOT com Website - http://www.evilbill.org.uk. There is no spoon. Hmm, yes, what then is your bad tech invention for the 21st c? The router i use to connect to t'internet? i should have put a smiley next to that first remark. I can see why the usa don't want them to have it, and i can see why other countries don't want thier affairs pried into by the usa. As for the christian countries, well, I havent had any gas bombs fired at my house before, or a death squad show up because my missus viewed an opinion in publilc, nor a nuke dropped on the hovel because my govt doesnt like my religion. "Carl" <me@theworld.universe> wrote in message > Hmm, yes, what then is your bad tech invention for the 21st c? The router > i use to connect to t'internet? Mobile phone ringtones ;) BLECH. LOL :) > i should have put a smiley next to that first remark. I can see why the > usa don't want them to have it, and i can see why other countries don't > want thier affairs pried into by the usa. As for the christian countries, > well, I havent had any gas bombs fired at my house before, or a death > squad show up because my missus viewed an opinion in publilc, nor a nuke > dropped on the hovel because my govt doesnt like my religion. You don't get that in Egypt either... you do in Iraq, but only *after* the American invasion... SignatureJack of Hearts in The Eeeeevil Cabal (TINC...) E-mail - quake2lives AT gmail DOT com Website - http://www.evilbill.org.uk. There is no spoon. Hmm, yes, but I am gonna stick with what I posted out of devilment more than anything else! > Hmm, yes, but I am gonna stick with what I posted out of devilment more > than anything else! That works. ;) SignatureJack of Hearts in The Eeeeevil Cabal (TINC...) E-mail - quake2lives AT gmail DOT com Website - http://www.evilbill.org.uk. There is no spoon. > >I disagree with your number 1 slot, and would like to suggest the > >following: [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Bush is just as convinced as the Ayatollahs that God is on his side and all > other religions are evil, after all. ;) Is that why he always appeals to Islam as the religion of peace? Of course this shouldn't even be a serious point of contention. The difference between most countries having nukes and a country sympathetic to Bin Laden having one is obvious. "Beal" <bealrabbitslayer@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> Bush is just as convinced as the Ayatollahs that God is on his side and >> all >> other religions are evil, after all. ;) > > Is that why he always appeals to Islam as the religion of peace? He's also trying to ban everything that doesn't fit in with his religious viewpoint (same-sex marriage, abortion, contraception...) > Of course this shouldn't even be a serious point of contention. The > difference between most countries having nukes and a country > sympathetic to Bin Laden having one is obvious. And the difference between nuclear power and nuclear weapons is also obvious. Worst-case scenario, even if they *were* pursuing nuclear weapons - which as far as anyone knows, they're not, despite the sabre-rattling from Bush and Blair - they're 10-15 years away from having one. A lot can happen in 10-15 years. A lot can happen in *two* years. (Like a change of government in both the US and the UK, hopefully... one less inclined towards spin, rhetoric, sabre-rattling and militarism and more inclined towards being *nice* to people instead of bombing them all the time.) SignatureEvilBill - http://www.evilbill.org.uk No #1 - Allowing idiots onto Usenet. SignatureAndrew, contact via http://interpleb.googlepages.com Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards, please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text. Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question. TV on phones...I've always wanted bigger screens and have never understood the logic of squeezing images onto smaller screens. Just means more people wandering around not paying attention to what they are doing. Perhaps its part of some new population control mechanism - just chalk up anyone who walks in front of a car/truck etc while watching TV/talking on the phone/etc as roadkill? I'd have to say Computer games... Can't. stop.. playing....... starving....must ... have .. dinner.. > TV on phones...I've always wanted bigger screens and have never understood > the logic of squeezing images onto smaller screens. Just means more people > wandering around not paying attention to what they are doing. Perhaps its > part of some new population control mechanism - just chalk up anyone who > walks in front of a car/truck etc while watching TV/talking on the phone/etc > as roadkill? EvilBill, you are a divil! re: Worst-case scenario, even if they *were* pursuing nuclear weapons - which as far as anyone knows, they're not, despite the sabre-rattling from Bush and Blair - they're 10-15 years away from having one. And hopefully by then their young population will have voted for a government that suits them. I will explain- Iran has a young population, most of them (from articles I have read anyway) do not like these shah type religious nutters in charge, and would prefer a more western type govt. , I mean to say that they would like a government that is not bound by religion- and I can see what others mean about the USA- a prez who is a bible thumper, and an oil man to boot! > EvilBill, you are a divil! > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > govt. , I mean to say that they would like a government that is not bound > by religion- Exactly, yes - it's not yet been 30 years since the old Shahs were overthrown and the Ayatollahs put in place (with US backing, I might add...) And that will no doubt change in time. After all, people get fed up with governments easily, just look at us in the West who want them out pretty much as soon as they get in ;) > and I can see what others mean about the USA- a prez who is a bible > thumper, and an oil man to boot! Yeah, definitely! And a UK Prime Minister with his head so far up the President's arse you can only see his boots. The sooner we can vote them both out, the better ;) SignatureEvilBill - http://www.evilbill.org.uk |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.