Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Platforms
PCXboxPlayStationNintendo
Games
ActionStrategyRole Playing GamesSimulatorsSport Games

Game Forum / Action Games / Grand Theft Auto / January 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

video woes on both PC's

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
SGF - 24 Jan 2004 12:47 GMT
I just got GTA Vice City, PC version. I tried to install it on my laptop
with the following specs.
Win XP Home (All current patches and updates)
2.0 GB Celeron
256 MB RAM
30 MB hard drive (with plenty of free space)
Graphic controller is an Intel (R) 82852.82855 GM/GME

It goes through the entire installation fine until I click play new game, At
that point it gives me the following error message "Microsoft Windows
detected and recovered from a device failure. Please save your work and
reboot to restore full functionality". When this takes place everything on
the screen is enlarged and the PC locks up. Once I reboot all is well. I
installed and removed the game twice with like results. I tried changing
resolutions via Windows and the game but it didn't help.

After it failed to load on XP laptop I figured I'd try it on my Win 2000
desktop PC. Specs follow:
900 MHz AMD Athalon
512 MB Ram
Voodoo III AGP video card with current drivers

When I try to play on this PC I get a "not enough video memory" error.

I'll load it on whichever PC it is easier to get it to work on. I looked at
the Rockstar site but couldn't find an answer. I also e-mailed for advice
but have not yet received a response.

Any suggestions, for either PC, would be appreciated.

SGF
Andrew - 24 Jan 2004 12:52 GMT
>Any suggestions, for either PC, would be appreciated.

Both of them have abysmally underpowered graphics cards to play GTA:VC
on.
Signature

Andrew. To email unscramble nrc@gurjevgrzrboivbhf.pbz & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.

SGF - 24 Jan 2004 13:26 GMT
>Andrew wrote
Both of them have abysmally underpowered graphics cards to play GTA:VC
> on.

Replacing the laptop video card is obviously not an option.  I thought the
desktop's Voodoo card would be okay since Return to CastleWolfenstein and
Hexen II work fine with it. I guess GTA is upping the video ante.

Assuming the desktop is otherwise capable, what replacement card would you
recommend. I obviously don't want to spend a fortune just to play one game
but I also don't want the aggravation of constant video problems.

SGF
Andrew - 24 Jan 2004 13:32 GMT
>Replacing the laptop video card is obviously not an option.  I thought the
>desktop's Voodoo card would be okay since Return to CastleWolfenstein and
>Hexen II work fine with it. I guess GTA is upping the video ante.

Hexen II is based on a 10 year old game engine, and RTCW is based on a
5 year old engine. Things have moved on slightly.

>Assuming the desktop is otherwise capable, what replacement card would you
>recommend. I obviously don't want to spend a fortune just to play one game
>but I also don't want the aggravation of constant video problems.

I am not sure what budget cards would be able to run it, and if they
could you still might me limited by your processor. Something like a
second hand Geforce 4 4200 may be worth looking at.
Signature

Andrew. To email unscramble nrc@gurjevgrzrboivbhf.pbz & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.

Stephen Horne - 25 Jan 2004 00:00 GMT
>>Replacing the laptop video card is obviously not an option.  I thought the
>>desktop's Voodoo card would be okay since Return to CastleWolfenstein and
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>could you still might me limited by your processor. Something like a
>second hand Geforce 4 4200 may be worth looking at.

Be careful with nVidia based cards - if you get an FX series card
there are known bugs which may mean you need to get the patched
version, and I have had other problems too.

Budget wise, I used to play Vice City using a GeForce 2 mx400 card and
it was very playable. The frame rate was a slight problem in GTA 3 on
that card, but Vice City was much smoother.

I'm not saying that it's ideal for Vice City. I had to limit the
resolution to 640x480, and there is some loss of graphics quality
using this old a card. It's nice to have the extra graphics quality,
but whether its worth paying for the graphics card to support it is a
different issue. You don't lose anything essential to gameplay.

The GeForce 4 mx440 card is significantly better IIRC so may work out
better given that the price difference will be trivial now.

Basically, therefore, anything above a GeForce 2 mx400 should be fine
for Vice City, though you may want something a little better if you
plan on buying GTA 3 - any GeForce 4 or above.

The mx440 is definitely still available (not sure about the mx400) but
if you play many games, of course, you need to consider that both are
at the extreme budget end. New games may well not work on them.

You may also be having operating system issues. I simply cannot run
Vice City on Windows XP Home (SP1 + current updates etc) because of a
bug that Take 2 refuses to acknowledge. I have told them about it, but
they are morons. I told them that the bug occurred on a non-FX series
card and that I had followed all advice (including the patch) for
people with FX series cards for my current set up, and I told them
that the bug only occurred when I switched to WinXP. Their response
was to tell me to download the patch. In other words, they didn't even
read the e-mail - they just autorespond based on the graphics card
identified in the diagnostic dumps you have to provide, completely
ignoring what you tell them.

Anyway, my experience is that Vice City doesn't work properly on
Windows XP Home at all. I currently have a Windows 2000 professional
partition purely for Vice City - it works on that, but needs the v1.1
patch.

I have had odd problems in the past on Win2000, but they related to a
games controller rather than the game itself.

The only O/S that Vice City has a perfect record on, in my experience,
is Windows 98SE. Which I can't run anymore - at least not if I want to
install drivers for my graphics and sound cards.

So my advice is to run Win98SE (or presumably Millenium) if you
possibly can, though your desktop with Win2000 is probably fine if you
upgrade your graphics card.

Or it would be - but an Athlon 900MHz is pretty close to the P3/Athlon
800MHz which is specified as the minimum for the game. Don't expect
brilliant performance. This may, of course, be another reason to run
Win98SE rather than Win2000 - lower overheads.
SGF - 25 Jan 2004 22:01 GMT
Budget wise, I used to play Vice City using a GeForce 2 mx400 card and
> it was very playable. The frame rate was a slight problem in GTA 3 on
> that card, but Vice City was much smoother.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> The GeForce 4 mx440 card is significantly better IIRC so may work out

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
Since I wrote them already I think I'm going to see what RockStar Games
recommends and go from there. Everything that you and Andrew have said makes
perfect sense. I doubt that the company will tell me much of anything
different but I'll post what I find out.

I'm not a game player, which I'm sure shows, so although I work in the
computer field  I really wasn't thinking about how much resources this game
took or how old my home built desktop is getting. I figured the desktop PC
might be an issue but I was fully confident that the laptop could handle it.

I'd be willing to shell out "some" cash for a better video card but going
back to 98 isn't an option. These two PC's do everything well, apparently
except play GTAVC, and I'm a Win2000 fan.  If it comes down to the game
gathering dust, or it playing poorly, or it requiring major hardware
upgrades, then gather dust it shall.

I found this card on ebay. It seems in the range of what you have both
recommended.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2782289893&category=40161

I'm not familiar with what these cards are going for but it seems reasonable
based on the little research I've done, Opinions?

SGF
Brokenrabbit - 31 Jan 2004 11:14 GMT
   It will indeed run Vice City just fine. Be aware, however, that a
GeForce4 MX is not a true GeForce4, as the MX does not support advnaced
DirectX 8 shader extentions like the GeForce4 TI series does. However,
considering the speed of the rest of your system, you really don't want to
spend the money on video card features you won't use because the rest of
your system doesn't meet the minimum requirements to run those games. So if
all you want a card for is GTA, $14 for a GeForce4 MX is a deal you'll be
hard pressed to find again.

   Just realize that for most recent games and just about any game coming
out henceforth, you're going to need to start building a new PC.

Signature

brokenrabbit

>  Budget wise, I used to play Vice City using a GeForce 2 mx400 card and
> > it was very playable. The frame rate was a slight problem in GTA 3 on
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> I found this card on ebay. It seems in the range of what you have both
> recommended.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2782289893&category=40161

> I'm not familiar with what these cards are going for but it seems reasonable
> based on the little research I've done, Opinions?
>
> SGF
Mike Kohary - 25 Jan 2004 22:09 GMT
> I just got GTA Vice City, PC version. I tried to install it on my laptop
> with the following specs.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Any suggestions, for either PC, would be appreciated.

Both graphics card/controllers are woefully underpowered by today's
standards.  It would probably be easiest to get your desktop machine working
with this, by simply replacing the Voodoo card with something modern from
ATI or NVidia.  You can get a really nice card these days for about $250, or
a budget card that will still be better than the Voodoo for $150 or less.
Make sure whatever you get is DirectX 9.0 compatible.

Mike
Eric Witte - 26 Jan 2004 21:44 GMT
> Both graphics card/controllers are woefully underpowered by today's
> standards.  It would probably be easiest to get your desktop machine working
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Mike

I got lucky getting my 128MB 9500np when I did.  Back when they were
using the 9700 layout.  It works great with the softmod and has lasted
longer than any card I remember.

Eric
long_b - 27 Jan 2004 07:33 GMT
> > Both graphics card/controllers are woefully underpowered by today's
> > standards.  It would probably be easiest to get your desktop machine working
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Eric

I've got the exact same problem with my laptop. I've downloaded the
latest versions of DirectX and the Intel drivers - still no good.

I don't (really) mind if I can't play the game but what bugs me is
that Intel say I should be able to run it - see here ...
http://www.intel.com/support/graphics/gaming/82852.htm

I'd appreciate any help on this - it's driving me nuts.

Joe
SGF - 27 Jan 2004 23:08 GMT
I've got the exact same problem with my laptop. I've downloaded the
latest versions of DirectX and the Intel drivers - still no good.

I don't (really) mind if I can't play the game but what bugs me is
that Intel say I should be able to run it - see here ...
http://www.intel.com/support/graphics/gaming/82852.htm

I'd appreciate any help on this - it's driving me nuts.

If I find anything out I'll definately share it. I wrote Rockstar games
tech. support an e-mail on Friday concerning the laptop and a second one
addressing the issues with the dektop. So far I have not received a
response. I have no idea how they are about answering their customers but I
sure hope I receive a well thought out response by tomorow.

I wonder if Joe and I should contact Intel. It couldn't hurt with the laptop
issue. If it doesn't work out I'll go the sound card route on the desktop.

SGF
long_b - 28 Jan 2004 09:28 GMT
> I've got the exact same problem with my laptop. I've downloaded the
> latest versions of DirectX and the Intel drivers - still no good.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> SGF

SGF,

Contacted Intel yesterday.

Have been fiddling with the DirectX / hardware acceleration settings
but with no success.

Can you run the graphics tests correctly in DXDIAG.exe ? They seem to
run OK for me, but I noticed that after the game crashes if you rerun
DXDIAG.exe it says that the "Direct 3D Acceleration" has become
disabled.

For the desktop have you tried turning down the hardware acceleration
setting in Start | Settings | Control Panel | Display | Settings |
Advanced | Troubleshooting ?
long_b - 29 Jan 2004 09:30 GMT
> > I've got the exact same problem with my laptop. I've downloaded the
> > latest versions of DirectX and the Intel drivers - still no good.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> setting in Start | Settings | Control Panel | Display | Settings |
> Advanced | Troubleshooting ?

FIXED !! Got the VERY latest driver for graphics card and chipset from
Intel (ver 6.14). :)
long_b - 29 Jan 2004 12:29 GMT
> > I've got the exact same problem with my laptop. I've downloaded the
> > latest versions of DirectX and the Intel drivers - still no good.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> setting in Start | Settings | Control Panel | Display | Settings |
> Advanced | Troubleshooting ?

Fixed by the latest drivers - they're here ...

http://downloadfinder2.intel.com/scripts-df/filter_results.asp?strOSs=44&strType
s=DRV%2CARC%2CUTL&ProductID=955&OSFullName=Windows*+XP+Professional&submit=Go%21


It runs fine now, only thing is I can't hear the in-game sound effects
(apart from the radio and the cut-scenes). Strange ...
SGF - 31 Jan 2004 10:44 GMT
It runs fine now, only thing is I can't hear the in-game sound effects
> (apart from the radio and the cut-scenes). Strange ...

Kudos, it fixed my problem as well. BTW, Intel finally responded to my
questions but the game manufacturer still hasn't bothered.

SGF
ANDREW BELL - 28 Jan 2004 23:53 GMT
> I just got GTA Vice City, PC version. I tried to install it on my laptop
> with the following specs.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> SGF

How much video memory do you have (on either system)?
The readme file says the game will refuse to run if you have less than 32MB
video RAM. (That's also the minimum spec. listed on the outside of the box).
BTW, in response to another poster in this thread, I've had both GTA III and
VC run fine with both Win98 SE and with XP home SP1 (using 128MB Radeon 9500
Pro).

Andy
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.