>Replacing the laptop video card is obviously not an option. I thought the
>desktop's Voodoo card would be okay since Return to CastleWolfenstein and
>Hexen II work fine with it. I guess GTA is upping the video ante.

Signature
Andrew. To email unscramble nrc@gurjevgrzrboivbhf.pbz & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
>>Replacing the laptop video card is obviously not an option. I thought the
>>desktop's Voodoo card would be okay since Return to CastleWolfenstein and
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>could you still might me limited by your processor. Something like a
>second hand Geforce 4 4200 may be worth looking at.
Be careful with nVidia based cards - if you get an FX series card
there are known bugs which may mean you need to get the patched
version, and I have had other problems too.
Budget wise, I used to play Vice City using a GeForce 2 mx400 card and
it was very playable. The frame rate was a slight problem in GTA 3 on
that card, but Vice City was much smoother.
I'm not saying that it's ideal for Vice City. I had to limit the
resolution to 640x480, and there is some loss of graphics quality
using this old a card. It's nice to have the extra graphics quality,
but whether its worth paying for the graphics card to support it is a
different issue. You don't lose anything essential to gameplay.
The GeForce 4 mx440 card is significantly better IIRC so may work out
better given that the price difference will be trivial now.
Basically, therefore, anything above a GeForce 2 mx400 should be fine
for Vice City, though you may want something a little better if you
plan on buying GTA 3 - any GeForce 4 or above.
The mx440 is definitely still available (not sure about the mx400) but
if you play many games, of course, you need to consider that both are
at the extreme budget end. New games may well not work on them.
You may also be having operating system issues. I simply cannot run
Vice City on Windows XP Home (SP1 + current updates etc) because of a
bug that Take 2 refuses to acknowledge. I have told them about it, but
they are morons. I told them that the bug occurred on a non-FX series
card and that I had followed all advice (including the patch) for
people with FX series cards for my current set up, and I told them
that the bug only occurred when I switched to WinXP. Their response
was to tell me to download the patch. In other words, they didn't even
read the e-mail - they just autorespond based on the graphics card
identified in the diagnostic dumps you have to provide, completely
ignoring what you tell them.
Anyway, my experience is that Vice City doesn't work properly on
Windows XP Home at all. I currently have a Windows 2000 professional
partition purely for Vice City - it works on that, but needs the v1.1
patch.
I have had odd problems in the past on Win2000, but they related to a
games controller rather than the game itself.
The only O/S that Vice City has a perfect record on, in my experience,
is Windows 98SE. Which I can't run anymore - at least not if I want to
install drivers for my graphics and sound cards.
So my advice is to run Win98SE (or presumably Millenium) if you
possibly can, though your desktop with Win2000 is probably fine if you
upgrade your graphics card.
Or it would be - but an Athlon 900MHz is pretty close to the P3/Athlon
800MHz which is specified as the minimum for the game. Don't expect
brilliant performance. This may, of course, be another reason to run
Win98SE rather than Win2000 - lower overheads.
SGF - 25 Jan 2004 22:01 GMT
Budget wise, I used to play Vice City using a GeForce 2 mx400 card and
> it was very playable. The frame rate was a slight problem in GTA 3 on
> that card, but Vice City was much smoother.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> The GeForce 4 mx440 card is significantly better IIRC so may work out
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
Since I wrote them already I think I'm going to see what RockStar Games
recommends and go from there. Everything that you and Andrew have said makes
perfect sense. I doubt that the company will tell me much of anything
different but I'll post what I find out.
I'm not a game player, which I'm sure shows, so although I work in the
computer field I really wasn't thinking about how much resources this game
took or how old my home built desktop is getting. I figured the desktop PC
might be an issue but I was fully confident that the laptop could handle it.
I'd be willing to shell out "some" cash for a better video card but going
back to 98 isn't an option. These two PC's do everything well, apparently
except play GTAVC, and I'm a Win2000 fan. If it comes down to the game
gathering dust, or it playing poorly, or it requiring major hardware
upgrades, then gather dust it shall.
I found this card on ebay. It seems in the range of what you have both
recommended.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2782289893&category=40161
I'm not familiar with what these cards are going for but it seems reasonable
based on the little research I've done, Opinions?
SGF
Brokenrabbit - 31 Jan 2004 11:14 GMT
It will indeed run Vice City just fine. Be aware, however, that a
GeForce4 MX is not a true GeForce4, as the MX does not support advnaced
DirectX 8 shader extentions like the GeForce4 TI series does. However,
considering the speed of the rest of your system, you really don't want to
spend the money on video card features you won't use because the rest of
your system doesn't meet the minimum requirements to run those games. So if
all you want a card for is GTA, $14 for a GeForce4 MX is a deal you'll be
hard pressed to find again.
Just realize that for most recent games and just about any game coming
out henceforth, you're going to need to start building a new PC.

Signature
brokenrabbit
> Budget wise, I used to play Vice City using a GeForce 2 mx400 card and
> > it was very playable. The frame rate was a slight problem in GTA 3 on
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> I found this card on ebay. It seems in the range of what you have both
> recommended.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2782289893&category=40161
> I'm not familiar with what these cards are going for but it seems reasonable
> based on the little research I've done, Opinions?
>
> SGF