Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Platforms
PCXboxPlayStationNintendo
Games
ActionStrategyRole Playing GamesSimulatorsSport Games

Game Forum / Action Games / Grand Theft Auto / December 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is GTA IV worth getting?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
kirk - 09 Nov 2008 11:40 GMT
I have a PC and no game consoles.   I have really enjoyed GTA III and
Vice City.   SA was questionable for me as I was unable to complete
the game due to my inability to get past the flight school.

Christmas is approaching as is the potential release of GTA IV for the
PC.   I would like to know if GTA IV is a worthwhile game or if it is
time to pack up the franchise.

I have noticed a general lack of interest in this group toward IV. Is
that because the game is bad or because people have moved away from
USENET?

Please give me some thoughts and help me decide.

thanks
Thomas Adams - 09 Nov 2008 12:59 GMT
> I have noticed a general lack of interest in this group toward IV. Is
> that because the game is bad or because people have moved away from
> USENET?

It is certainly true that people have moved away from Usenet. But this
particular group was buzzing for quite some time after GTA IV's release.
I guess most people have finished it and moved on to other games.

I would recommend it to you. I didn't experience a major blocker in the
game like the flight school in SA that you mentioned.
Paul Heslop - 09 Nov 2008 13:15 GMT
> > I have noticed a general lack of interest in this group toward IV. Is
> > that because the game is bad or because people have moved away from
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I would recommend it to you. I didn't experience a major blocker in the
> game like the flight school in SA that you mentioned.

I just got a little bored with it, but that happens.

For the OP this game doesn't seem to have generated the hardcore of
fans that SA got. still a fantastic looking thing and some really cool
stuff in it, but it did have a hard act to follow.

Signature

Paul  (We won't die of devotion)  
-------------------------------------------------------  
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

Andrew - 09 Nov 2008 17:23 GMT
>I have a PC and no game consoles.   I have really enjoyed GTA III and
>Vice City.   SA was questionable for me as I was unable to complete
>the game due to my inability to get past the flight school.

Using a gamepad and first person view is pretty much essential for
flying in SA.

>Christmas is approaching as is the potential release of GTA IV for the
>PC.   I would like to know if GTA IV is a worthwhile game or if it is
>time to pack up the franchise.

It kind of depends on what you liked about the series. For me GTA4 is
going back to GTA3, but a bit less fun than that was. It is an amazing
recreation of a virtual city, but it feels a bit dull compared to
GTA:SA.

>I have noticed a general lack of interest in this group toward IV. Is
>that because the game is bad or because people have moved away from
>USENET?

Most of the contributors in here have an unjustified chip on their
shoulder about cross platform games.
Signature

Andrew, contact via http://interpleb.googlepages.com
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.

Andrew - 09 Nov 2008 17:24 GMT
>Most of the contributors in here have an unjustified chip on their
>shoulder about cross platform games.

Oops, ignore that comment, I thought I was posting in another group
:-)
Signature

Andrew, contact via http://interpleb.googlepages.com
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.

Paul Heslop - 09 Nov 2008 19:59 GMT
> >Most of the contributors in here have an unjustified chip on their
> >shoulder about cross platform games.
>
> Oops, ignore that comment, I thought I was posting in another group
> :-)

I was just going to slap you one aswell :O)

Signature

Paul  (We won't die of devotion)  
-------------------------------------------------------  
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

Anssi Saari - 10 Nov 2008 13:00 GMT
> I have a PC and no game consoles.   I have really enjoyed GTA III and
> Vice City.   SA was questionable for me as I was unable to complete
> the game due to my inability to get past the flight school.

Yeah, flying is hard. Even though I got to the point where I can
easily pass the flight school missions, most of my landings are still
crash landings. Let alone actually fighting effectively with the
gunship or harrier...

> Christmas is approaching as is the potential release of GTA IV for the
> PC.   I would like to know if GTA IV is a worthwhile game or if it is
> time to pack up the franchise.

Well, that all depends on what the PC version will be like.
Traditionally, Rockstar has shown steady improvement with the PC
ports. GTA3 was pretty awful in my experience, but Vice City and SA
were great and the slightly clunky controls can be tuned with third
party tools.

Anyways, I'll probably get GTA4 for the PC when it comes out or maybe
later when it's cheaper. Depends on reviews. I don't have much time
for playing right now and there are other interesting PC games, like
Fallout 3, Red Alert 3, Dead Space. There's also Saints Row 2 which is
a GTA-like game and it's probably coming out on the PC as well,
although release has been pushed to January 5th now according to
Gamespot.

> I have noticed a general lack of interest in this group toward IV. Is
> that because the game is bad or because people have moved away from
> USENET?

Probably both. I played GTA4 on Xbox 360. Finished the plot, haven't
touched it since. In comparison, I played GTA:SA about halfway through
this spring on both PS2 and PC while waiting for GTA4, i.e. it was
still fun four years after release.

I guess I just didn't get into GTA4 and that's because the driving
isn't fun, the story is too dark and most of the characters too
annoying. I haven't even bothered trying to fly anything.
SimonH - 02 Dec 2008 11:05 GMT
A perspective from someone who has just bought GTA IV.  I only got it
yesterday, so these are first impressions only and things could
change.  Those first impressions, though, are good.  Very good.

> I have a PC and no game consoles.   I have really enjoyed GTA III and
> Vice City.   SA was questionable for me as I was unable to complete
> the game due to my inability to get past the flight school.
...
> Please give me some thoughts and help me decide.

Obviously I can't talk about the game's longevity but I can tell you
that two things I was worried about were blown away within minutes of
playing.

1. I've seen it said that GTA IV is not fun.  It is.  There is just as
much scope for random mayhem as ever and the humour, both in the story
cut scenes and in free play is superb.  The acting in the cut scenes
is the best I've seen in any game and I've only met the first four or
five characters.  Free play can generate some hilarious moments as
well (the first time you miss judge a jump and hit a wall at speed,
for example, as Niko shoots, screaming, through the windscreen over
the edge of the overpass into the traffic below.)

2. I've also heard that driving is crap.  It's not.  It's different,
sure, because it's more realistic and the new control scheme takes a
little getting used to*.  But the cars feel much better than they look
on Youtube.  In fact the whole game has a very "planted" solid feel to
it and everything crunches and squeals in a very realistic way.  The
only exception is the engine noises which are annoyingly sh.t in
comparison to everything else.

I love it.  In fact, working out how to divide my time between Fallout
3 and GTA IV is going to be the biggest challenge, I think.

Si

* I persevered with the new control scheme because I've defected from
Sony to MS so I'm using a different controller than I used for SA
anyway.
Andrew - 02 Dec 2008 16:30 GMT
>1. I've seen it said that GTA IV is not fun.  It is.

I am glad you like it, I got 60% through GTA4 and stopped playing
through boredom, that hasn't happened with any other previous 3D GTA's
for me.

>2. I've also heard that driving is crap.  It's not.  It's different,
>sure, because it's more realistic and the new control scheme takes a
>little getting used to*.

I don't know what cars you drive, but I haven't driven anything
remotely as bad as GTA4's car handling.
Signature

Andrew, contact via http://interpleb.googlepages.com
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.

Paul Heslop - 02 Dec 2008 21:55 GMT
> I don't know what cars you drive, but I haven't driven anything
> remotely as bad as GTA4's car handling.

I guess you don't own saint's row 2 or Test drive unlimited? SR2 is
fun but it is not a patch on GTA4 for driving or looks. Test drive
unlimited was one of my first favourites on the 360 but having played
PGR4 and Forza 2 and even GTA4 I think it's one of the worst games for
feeling jerky and the cars feel like they're stuck on a rod which you
wave around to steer. Having left the game for a while I find it very
hard to get back into.

GTA4 is not as bad as painted, but neither is it the best game ever.
Those graphics on San Andreas would have been fantastic.

Signature

Paul  (We won't die of devotion)  
-------------------------------------------------------  
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

SimonH - 03 Dec 2008 10:17 GMT
> GTA4 is not as bad as painted

That's all I was really trying to say.  I do love it, though, and
there are some real stand out bits.  The story cut scenes are
brilliant overall and some (like the one where Niko and Roman are tied
up in the basement by Dmitri's(?) goons) are hilarious.  If there has
ever been a better scripted and acted game story, I'd like to know
what it is because I want to play /that/ game.

>, but neither is it the best game ever.

I'm not even sure if it's the best game I've /got/ and I've only got
five.  I can't fit a cig paper between it and Fallout 3 at the moment
and sharing time between the two is tricky.

> Those graphics on San Andreas would have been fantastic.

And the physics, of course.  And the gritty Balkan humour.  And the
gruff, funny, flawed but instantly likable protagonist (I liked CJ,
don't get me wrong, but I'd rather /be/ this sardonic Serb - cool in a
way that you can't ink into your forearms.)  Oh, and it would need the
same level of chemistry between a cast of characters, some of which at
least, might as well be real people.

Si
Paul Heslop - 03 Dec 2008 12:23 GMT
> > GTA4 is not as bad as painted
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> ever been a better scripted and acted game story, I'd like to know
> what it is because I want to play /that/ game.

This doesn't work for me, I rarely watch cut scenes, too impatient. It
really pains me when I am forced to sit through them.

> >, but neither is it the best game ever.
>
> I'm not even sure if it's the best game I've /got/ and I've only got
> five.  I can't fit a cig paper between it and Fallout 3 at the moment
> and sharing time between the two is tricky.

Well I bought saints row 2 and am having more fun with it than I did
with GTA4, but I am annoyed that I kind of got bored with 4, in fact I
didn't finish the story line. I must make myself finish it just to see
if I can get back into it.

> > Those graphics on San Andreas would have been fantastic.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Si

Yeah, not keen on the balkan thing. There's something very cold about
our eastern bloc cousins, they scare me.

Signature

Paul  (We won't die of devotion)  
-------------------------------------------------------  
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

Odd Bob - 03 Dec 2008 16:42 GMT
Paul Heslop <paul.heslop@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in news:49367A1D.4F4ECEF3
@blueyonder.co.uk:

>> > GTA4 is not as bad as painted
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> This doesn't work for me, I rarely watch cut scenes, too impatient. It
> really pains me when I am forced to sit through them.

I enjoyed the cut scenes in GTA4.  I wish there was a way to replay them for when my wife was
present because she'd probably find them as funny as I did.

I get very tense during cut scenes though, because I never know what kind of insane situation I'll be
thrown into when they end so it's hard to relax and really enjoy them like they were meant to be.  
That's another reason I'd like the replay.

>> >, but neither is it the best game ever.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> didn't finish the story line. I must make myself finish it just to see
> if I can get back into it.

I quit playing the story line as soon as I opened up the entire game area (like I usually do in GTA) and
got sidetracked exploring and finding pigeons.  See, by the time I reach this point, the missions are
starting to get hard (and frustrating) as hell and the rewards are either redundant (MORE money?  To
spend on what?) or just uninteresting to me.  I wish Rockstar would somehow come up with better
incentives to actually finish the game.  The only GTA I've finished, Vice City, gave me little I didn't
already have before I finished.  I'm not particularly enticed by the upcoming DLC, either, though the
weapons sound pretty sweet.

>> > Those graphics on San Andreas would have been fantastic.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Yeah, not keen on the balkan thing. There's something very cold about
> our eastern bloc cousins, they scare me.

I kinda like Niko, but he's someone I certainly would NOT want to know in real life.

-- Bob

(Spending all my play time on Fallout 3 right now.  This game has gripped me in a way that GTA never
did.)
Paul Heslop - 03 Dec 2008 18:02 GMT
> I enjoyed the cut scenes in GTA4.  I wish there was a way to replay them for when my wife was
> present because she'd probably find them as funny as I did.

I'm like that with the comedy club sketches. it's hard to describe
them but they are funny, whereas that cabaret place is the pits and
having to sit through that is painful.

> I get very tense during cut scenes though, because I never know what kind of insane situation I'll be
> thrown into when they end so it's hard to relax and really enjoy them like they were meant to be.
> That's another reason I'd like the replay.

I am wondering whether this is my problem. I kind of played about four
games at once for the other players on my machine to get the points,
maybe this was not a good approach.

> I quit playing the story line as soon as I opened up the entire game area (like I usually do in GTA) and
> got sidetracked exploring and finding pigeons.  See, by the time I reach this point, the missions are
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> already have before I finished.  I'm not particularly enticed by the upcoming DLC, either, though the
> weapons sound pretty sweet.

Yes, that was another thing. I've always tried to get the side
missions out of the way early and have a standing saved game with
those on so I never have to restart the game from cold, but it doesn't
seem possible in GTA4.

> > Yeah, not keen on the balkan thing. There's something very cold about
> > our eastern bloc cousins, they scare me.
>
> I kinda like Niko, but he's someone I certainly would NOT want to know in real life.

I like Niko, but like the Uncle and stuff, and even his cousin cousin
I just wanted to plug the bastards. I wanted to shoot his cousin
almost immediately, all that titties and stuff.

> -- Bob
>
> (Spending all my play time on Fallout 3 right now.  This game has gripped me in a way that GTA never
> did.)

Forza 2 has been my main play for months. I've also completed two lego
games which I play through with my smallest grandchild often as she
loves them but will only play alongside me, anyone else gets "You
don't know what you're doing!"

Signature

Paul  (We won't die of devotion)  
-------------------------------------------------------  
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

phexitol - 04 Dec 2008 05:48 GMT
Excited after finally graduating kindergarten after 20 gruelling years,
SimonH <simon.hudson1@gmail.com> burst forth on this most auspicious
occasion with the following:

>> GTA4 is not as bad as painted
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> ever been a better scripted and acted game story, I'd like to know
> what it is because I want to play /that/ game.

Have you played Heavenly Sword? Yes, it is short, but it is fun, and the
cutscenes are beyond compare. I can't totally recommend buying it at
full price, but if you can pick it up somewhere for $30 or so, you'll
have a blast. The chemistry between the villains, and between them and
the protagonists is excellent, thanks in no small part to Andy Serkis'
performance and direction.
SimonH - 04 Dec 2008 09:25 GMT
> Excited after finally graduating kindergarten after 20 gruelling years,
> SimonH <simon.huds...@gmail.com> burst forth on this most auspicious
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Have you played Heavenly Sword?

>Yes, it is short, but it is fun, and the
> cutscenes are beyond compare. I can't totally recommend buying it at
> full price, but if you can pick it up somewhere for $30 or so, you'll
> have a blast. The chemistry between the villains, and between them and
> the protagonists is excellent, thanks in no small part to Andy Serkis'
> performance and direction.

My 360 would choke on it, I'm afraid.  It does look quite good
though.  I wonder if Serkis has been or will be involved in anything
else.
SimonH - 03 Dec 2008 10:19 GMT
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 03:05:02 -0800 (PST), SimonH

> I don't know what cars you drive, but I haven't driven anything
> remotely as bad as GTA4's car handling.

I would like to know what you drive actually.  If you drive it at full
speed and swing the wheel to full lock while yanking on the handbrake
(as you would in, for the sake of argument, San Andreas) can you make
it round a corner cleanly?  Because my BMW 328 would slot you
backwards through a shop window.

Si
Andrew - 03 Dec 2008 10:53 GMT
>I would like to know what you drive actually.  If you drive it at full
>speed and swing the wheel to full lock while yanking on the handbrake
>(as you would in, for the sake of argument, San Andreas) can you make
>it round a corner cleanly?  Because my BMW 328 would slot you
>backwards through a shop window.

The GTA handling isn't realistic no matter what speed you are doing,
if they were realistic our roads would be strewn with wrecked cars.

What spoiled GTA4 for me was Burnout Paradise, it has way better
graphics and infinitely better car control. GTA's dodgy physics and
super blurrovision graphics ruined the experience for me. I really
wish they had got for a less ambitious game engine, something like
Saints Row and making it more fun.
Signature

Andrew, contact via http://interpleb.googlepages.com
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.

SimonH - 03 Dec 2008 11:33 GMT
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:19:39 -0800 (PST), SimonH

> The GTA handling isn't realistic no matter what speed you are doing,
> if they were realistic our roads would be strewn with wrecked cars.

Ah, no argument.  It is, however, *more* realistic than previous games
in the series.  Which is what I said.

> > ... It's different,
> > sure, because it's more realistic and the new control scheme takes a
> > little getting used to
Paul Heslop - 03 Dec 2008 12:24 GMT
> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:19:39 -0800 (PST), SimonH
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Ah, no argument.  It is, however, *more* realistic than previous games
> in the series.  Which is what I said.

yeah, i can't say the driving has ever been great, but I did get into
driving in GTA4, except on two wheels. I got fed up of falling off,
pretty much like real life :O)

Signature

Paul  (We won't die of devotion)  
-------------------------------------------------------  
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

Odd Bob - 03 Dec 2008 16:23 GMT
>> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:19:39 -0800 (PST), SimonH
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> driving in GTA4, except on two wheels. I got fed up of falling off,
> pretty much like real life :O)

Motorcycles were my transportation of choice in SA.  They may not have been realistic, but they sure
were a lot more fun than in GTA4.

Only time I've ever ridden a real motorcycle was during a training course almost 20 years ago.  I passed
the course (barely) and got the endorsement on my license, but never got the bucks together to actually
buy a bike.  The endorsement has long since lapsed, and I'm too aware of my mortality to really be
tempted to renew it and get a bike now...

-- Bob
Paul Heslop - 03 Dec 2008 18:04 GMT
> >> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:19:39 -0800 (PST), SimonH
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> -- Bob

I am awful in real life, on two or four wheels and even managed to
cream a mother and child on my paper round when I was a lad by hitting
them at full speed on my pushbike. I'm well dangerous on wheels :O)

saints row 2 bikes don't go faster or anything if you lean forward,
but the cool thing is wheelies are easier and if you have a  sword you
can slice people as you ride past.

Signature

Paul  (We won't die of devotion)  
-------------------------------------------------------  
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

GP Hardy - 03 Dec 2008 12:44 GMT
>... If you drive it at full speed and swing the wheel to full lock while
>yanking on the handbrake (as you would in, for the sake of argument, San
>Andreas) can you make it round a corner cleanly?  Because my BMW 328 would
>slot you backwards through a shop window.

My Explorer is a lot like the Landstalker from SA - you don't "drive" it,
you "guide" it.
Odd Bob - 03 Dec 2008 16:16 GMT
SimonH <simon.hudson1@gmail.com> wrote in news:7f805486-0a2a-45fd-8e79-c92bba89c836
@w35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:

>> On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 03:05:02 -0800 (PST), SimonH
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Si

I have no idea how realistic GTA4's driving physics because there's no way in hell I would EVER drive
like that in real life, especially not in traffic.  If I tried driving like that in RL for five minutes, I'd probably
wind up on CNN, just for the impressive pedestrian body count alone.  And then you wouldn't be hearing
from me again for at least thirty years, until I made parole...

On the infrequent occasions I drive sanely in the game, though, the physics seem quite realistic.  :)

-- Bob
snark - 03 Dec 2008 21:33 GMT
> I would like to know what you drive actually.  If you drive it at full
> speed and swing the wheel to full lock while yanking on the handbrake
> (as you would in, for the sake of argument, San Andreas) can you make
> it round a corner cleanly?  Because my BMW 328 would slot you
> backwards through a shop window.

Not fair. Not fair at all. There's no way a console computer game is
going to realistically simulate real driving. Pushing a thumbstick all
the way to the right should in no way be compared to turning a
steering wheel to full lock, and pressing a button should in no way be
compared to yanking on a handbrake. Asking someone to accurately
simulate driving a vehicle using a console controller is like asking
someone to do needlepoint whilst wearing boxing gloves.

Phil Hibbs.
SimonH - 04 Dec 2008 09:20 GMT
> > I would like to know what you drive actually.  If you drive it at full
> > speed and swing the wheel to full lock while yanking on the handbrake
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> simulate driving a vehicle using a console controller is like asking
> someone to do needlepoint whilst wearing boxing gloves.

I wish people would read and think about what I am saying.  Usenet is
as infuriating as it always was :)

The whole point is that it is *much easier* to simulate *more*
realistic driving in GTA IV *than in any previous version of the
game.*

And before you, or anyone else says it, *no*, I am not implying that
you can't finesse the handling of a car in SA.  What I am saying is
that it is a lot easier and more realistic in IV.  Some of this is
down to the new control layout and some of it is down to the way the
different vehicles respond to control input.

Paul H gets it, so I can't have been that oblique.

What we could argue (pointlessly) is which is more fun.  There are
clearly two camps here that will just have to agree to differ.

Si
snark - 05 Dec 2008 10:40 GMT
> I wish people would read and think about what I am saying.  Usenet is
> as infuriating as it always was :)

I did read it. I may have mis-interpreted it, but I did read it, and I
did think about it. And I'm not Usenet, I'm a person, a fallible
person. My mistake was probably in not going back and reading your
*other* posts to get some context for your analogy.

Phil Hibbs.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.