Game Forum / Action Games / Grand Theft Auto / December 2008
Is GTA IV worth getting?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
kirk - 09 Nov 2008 11:40 GMT I have a PC and no game consoles. I have really enjoyed GTA III and Vice City. SA was questionable for me as I was unable to complete the game due to my inability to get past the flight school.
Christmas is approaching as is the potential release of GTA IV for the PC. I would like to know if GTA IV is a worthwhile game or if it is time to pack up the franchise.
I have noticed a general lack of interest in this group toward IV. Is that because the game is bad or because people have moved away from USENET?
Please give me some thoughts and help me decide.
thanks
Thomas Adams - 09 Nov 2008 12:59 GMT > I have noticed a general lack of interest in this group toward IV. Is > that because the game is bad or because people have moved away from > USENET? It is certainly true that people have moved away from Usenet. But this particular group was buzzing for quite some time after GTA IV's release. I guess most people have finished it and moved on to other games.
I would recommend it to you. I didn't experience a major blocker in the game like the flight school in SA that you mentioned.
Paul Heslop - 09 Nov 2008 13:15 GMT > > I have noticed a general lack of interest in this group toward IV. Is > > that because the game is bad or because people have moved away from [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > I would recommend it to you. I didn't experience a major blocker in the > game like the flight school in SA that you mentioned. I just got a little bored with it, but that happens.
For the OP this game doesn't seem to have generated the hardcore of fans that SA got. still a fantastic looking thing and some really cool stuff in it, but it did have a hard act to follow.
 Signature Paul (We won't die of devotion) ------------------------------------------------------- Stop and Look http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/
Andrew - 09 Nov 2008 17:23 GMT >I have a PC and no game consoles. I have really enjoyed GTA III and >Vice City. SA was questionable for me as I was unable to complete >the game due to my inability to get past the flight school. Using a gamepad and first person view is pretty much essential for flying in SA.
>Christmas is approaching as is the potential release of GTA IV for the >PC. I would like to know if GTA IV is a worthwhile game or if it is >time to pack up the franchise. It kind of depends on what you liked about the series. For me GTA4 is going back to GTA3, but a bit less fun than that was. It is an amazing recreation of a virtual city, but it feels a bit dull compared to GTA:SA.
>I have noticed a general lack of interest in this group toward IV. Is >that because the game is bad or because people have moved away from >USENET? Most of the contributors in here have an unjustified chip on their shoulder about cross platform games.
 Signature Andrew, contact via http://interpleb.googlepages.com Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards, please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text. Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.
Andrew - 09 Nov 2008 17:24 GMT >Most of the contributors in here have an unjustified chip on their >shoulder about cross platform games. Oops, ignore that comment, I thought I was posting in another group
:-)  Signature Andrew, contact via http://interpleb.googlepages.com Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards, please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text. Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.
Paul Heslop - 09 Nov 2008 19:59 GMT > >Most of the contributors in here have an unjustified chip on their > >shoulder about cross platform games. > > Oops, ignore that comment, I thought I was posting in another group > :-) I was just going to slap you one aswell :O)
 Signature Paul (We won't die of devotion) ------------------------------------------------------- Stop and Look http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/
Anssi Saari - 10 Nov 2008 13:00 GMT > I have a PC and no game consoles. I have really enjoyed GTA III and > Vice City. SA was questionable for me as I was unable to complete > the game due to my inability to get past the flight school. Yeah, flying is hard. Even though I got to the point where I can easily pass the flight school missions, most of my landings are still crash landings. Let alone actually fighting effectively with the gunship or harrier...
> Christmas is approaching as is the potential release of GTA IV for the > PC. I would like to know if GTA IV is a worthwhile game or if it is > time to pack up the franchise. Well, that all depends on what the PC version will be like. Traditionally, Rockstar has shown steady improvement with the PC ports. GTA3 was pretty awful in my experience, but Vice City and SA were great and the slightly clunky controls can be tuned with third party tools.
Anyways, I'll probably get GTA4 for the PC when it comes out or maybe later when it's cheaper. Depends on reviews. I don't have much time for playing right now and there are other interesting PC games, like Fallout 3, Red Alert 3, Dead Space. There's also Saints Row 2 which is a GTA-like game and it's probably coming out on the PC as well, although release has been pushed to January 5th now according to Gamespot.
> I have noticed a general lack of interest in this group toward IV. Is > that because the game is bad or because people have moved away from > USENET? Probably both. I played GTA4 on Xbox 360. Finished the plot, haven't touched it since. In comparison, I played GTA:SA about halfway through this spring on both PS2 and PC while waiting for GTA4, i.e. it was still fun four years after release.
I guess I just didn't get into GTA4 and that's because the driving isn't fun, the story is too dark and most of the characters too annoying. I haven't even bothered trying to fly anything.
SimonH - 02 Dec 2008 11:05 GMT A perspective from someone who has just bought GTA IV. I only got it yesterday, so these are first impressions only and things could change. Those first impressions, though, are good. Very good.
> I have a PC and no game consoles. I have really enjoyed GTA III and > Vice City. SA was questionable for me as I was unable to complete > the game due to my inability to get past the flight school. ...
> Please give me some thoughts and help me decide. Obviously I can't talk about the game's longevity but I can tell you that two things I was worried about were blown away within minutes of playing.
1. I've seen it said that GTA IV is not fun. It is. There is just as much scope for random mayhem as ever and the humour, both in the story cut scenes and in free play is superb. The acting in the cut scenes is the best I've seen in any game and I've only met the first four or five characters. Free play can generate some hilarious moments as well (the first time you miss judge a jump and hit a wall at speed, for example, as Niko shoots, screaming, through the windscreen over the edge of the overpass into the traffic below.)
2. I've also heard that driving is crap. It's not. It's different, sure, because it's more realistic and the new control scheme takes a little getting used to*. But the cars feel much better than they look on Youtube. In fact the whole game has a very "planted" solid feel to it and everything crunches and squeals in a very realistic way. The only exception is the engine noises which are annoyingly sh.t in comparison to everything else.
I love it. In fact, working out how to divide my time between Fallout 3 and GTA IV is going to be the biggest challenge, I think.
Si
* I persevered with the new control scheme because I've defected from Sony to MS so I'm using a different controller than I used for SA anyway.
Andrew - 02 Dec 2008 16:30 GMT >1. I've seen it said that GTA IV is not fun. It is. I am glad you like it, I got 60% through GTA4 and stopped playing through boredom, that hasn't happened with any other previous 3D GTA's for me.
>2. I've also heard that driving is crap. It's not. It's different, >sure, because it's more realistic and the new control scheme takes a >little getting used to*. I don't know what cars you drive, but I haven't driven anything remotely as bad as GTA4's car handling.
 Signature Andrew, contact via http://interpleb.googlepages.com Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards, please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text. Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.
Paul Heslop - 02 Dec 2008 21:55 GMT > I don't know what cars you drive, but I haven't driven anything > remotely as bad as GTA4's car handling. I guess you don't own saint's row 2 or Test drive unlimited? SR2 is fun but it is not a patch on GTA4 for driving or looks. Test drive unlimited was one of my first favourites on the 360 but having played PGR4 and Forza 2 and even GTA4 I think it's one of the worst games for feeling jerky and the cars feel like they're stuck on a rod which you wave around to steer. Having left the game for a while I find it very hard to get back into.
GTA4 is not as bad as painted, but neither is it the best game ever. Those graphics on San Andreas would have been fantastic.
 Signature Paul (We won't die of devotion) ------------------------------------------------------- Stop and Look http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/
SimonH - 03 Dec 2008 10:17 GMT > GTA4 is not as bad as painted That's all I was really trying to say. I do love it, though, and there are some real stand out bits. The story cut scenes are brilliant overall and some (like the one where Niko and Roman are tied up in the basement by Dmitri's(?) goons) are hilarious. If there has ever been a better scripted and acted game story, I'd like to know what it is because I want to play /that/ game.
>, but neither is it the best game ever. I'm not even sure if it's the best game I've /got/ and I've only got five. I can't fit a cig paper between it and Fallout 3 at the moment and sharing time between the two is tricky.
> Those graphics on San Andreas would have been fantastic. And the physics, of course. And the gritty Balkan humour. And the gruff, funny, flawed but instantly likable protagonist (I liked CJ, don't get me wrong, but I'd rather /be/ this sardonic Serb - cool in a way that you can't ink into your forearms.) Oh, and it would need the same level of chemistry between a cast of characters, some of which at least, might as well be real people.
Si
Paul Heslop - 03 Dec 2008 12:23 GMT > > GTA4 is not as bad as painted > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > ever been a better scripted and acted game story, I'd like to know > what it is because I want to play /that/ game. This doesn't work for me, I rarely watch cut scenes, too impatient. It really pains me when I am forced to sit through them.
> >, but neither is it the best game ever. > > I'm not even sure if it's the best game I've /got/ and I've only got > five. I can't fit a cig paper between it and Fallout 3 at the moment > and sharing time between the two is tricky. Well I bought saints row 2 and am having more fun with it than I did with GTA4, but I am annoyed that I kind of got bored with 4, in fact I didn't finish the story line. I must make myself finish it just to see if I can get back into it.
> > Those graphics on San Andreas would have been fantastic. > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Si Yeah, not keen on the balkan thing. There's something very cold about our eastern bloc cousins, they scare me.
 Signature Paul (We won't die of devotion) ------------------------------------------------------- Stop and Look http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/
Odd Bob - 03 Dec 2008 16:42 GMT Paul Heslop <paul.heslop@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in news:49367A1D.4F4ECEF3 @blueyonder.co.uk:
>> > GTA4 is not as bad as painted >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > This doesn't work for me, I rarely watch cut scenes, too impatient. It > really pains me when I am forced to sit through them. I enjoyed the cut scenes in GTA4. I wish there was a way to replay them for when my wife was present because she'd probably find them as funny as I did.
I get very tense during cut scenes though, because I never know what kind of insane situation I'll be thrown into when they end so it's hard to relax and really enjoy them like they were meant to be. That's another reason I'd like the replay.
>> >, but neither is it the best game ever. >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > didn't finish the story line. I must make myself finish it just to see > if I can get back into it. I quit playing the story line as soon as I opened up the entire game area (like I usually do in GTA) and got sidetracked exploring and finding pigeons. See, by the time I reach this point, the missions are starting to get hard (and frustrating) as hell and the rewards are either redundant (MORE money? To spend on what?) or just uninteresting to me. I wish Rockstar would somehow come up with better incentives to actually finish the game. The only GTA I've finished, Vice City, gave me little I didn't already have before I finished. I'm not particularly enticed by the upcoming DLC, either, though the weapons sound pretty sweet.
>> > Those graphics on San Andreas would have been fantastic. >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Yeah, not keen on the balkan thing. There's something very cold about > our eastern bloc cousins, they scare me. I kinda like Niko, but he's someone I certainly would NOT want to know in real life.
-- Bob
(Spending all my play time on Fallout 3 right now. This game has gripped me in a way that GTA never did.)
Paul Heslop - 03 Dec 2008 18:02 GMT > I enjoyed the cut scenes in GTA4. I wish there was a way to replay them for when my wife was > present because she'd probably find them as funny as I did. I'm like that with the comedy club sketches. it's hard to describe them but they are funny, whereas that cabaret place is the pits and having to sit through that is painful.
> I get very tense during cut scenes though, because I never know what kind of insane situation I'll be > thrown into when they end so it's hard to relax and really enjoy them like they were meant to be. > That's another reason I'd like the replay. I am wondering whether this is my problem. I kind of played about four games at once for the other players on my machine to get the points, maybe this was not a good approach.
> I quit playing the story line as soon as I opened up the entire game area (like I usually do in GTA) and > got sidetracked exploring and finding pigeons. See, by the time I reach this point, the missions are [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > already have before I finished. I'm not particularly enticed by the upcoming DLC, either, though the > weapons sound pretty sweet. Yes, that was another thing. I've always tried to get the side missions out of the way early and have a standing saved game with those on so I never have to restart the game from cold, but it doesn't seem possible in GTA4.
> > Yeah, not keen on the balkan thing. There's something very cold about > > our eastern bloc cousins, they scare me. > > I kinda like Niko, but he's someone I certainly would NOT want to know in real life. I like Niko, but like the Uncle and stuff, and even his cousin cousin I just wanted to plug the bastards. I wanted to shoot his cousin almost immediately, all that titties and stuff.
> -- Bob > > (Spending all my play time on Fallout 3 right now. This game has gripped me in a way that GTA never > did.) Forza 2 has been my main play for months. I've also completed two lego games which I play through with my smallest grandchild often as she loves them but will only play alongside me, anyone else gets "You don't know what you're doing!"
 Signature Paul (We won't die of devotion) ------------------------------------------------------- Stop and Look http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/
phexitol - 04 Dec 2008 05:48 GMT Excited after finally graduating kindergarten after 20 gruelling years, SimonH <simon.hudson1@gmail.com> burst forth on this most auspicious occasion with the following:
>> GTA4 is not as bad as painted > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > ever been a better scripted and acted game story, I'd like to know > what it is because I want to play /that/ game. Have you played Heavenly Sword? Yes, it is short, but it is fun, and the cutscenes are beyond compare. I can't totally recommend buying it at full price, but if you can pick it up somewhere for $30 or so, you'll have a blast. The chemistry between the villains, and between them and the protagonists is excellent, thanks in no small part to Andy Serkis' performance and direction.
SimonH - 04 Dec 2008 09:25 GMT > Excited after finally graduating kindergarten after 20 gruelling years, > SimonH <simon.huds...@gmail.com> burst forth on this most auspicious [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Have you played Heavenly Sword?
>Yes, it is short, but it is fun, and the > cutscenes are beyond compare. I can't totally recommend buying it at > full price, but if you can pick it up somewhere for $30 or so, you'll > have a blast. The chemistry between the villains, and between them and > the protagonists is excellent, thanks in no small part to Andy Serkis' > performance and direction. My 360 would choke on it, I'm afraid. It does look quite good though. I wonder if Serkis has been or will be involved in anything else.
SimonH - 03 Dec 2008 10:19 GMT > On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 03:05:02 -0800 (PST), SimonH
> I don't know what cars you drive, but I haven't driven anything > remotely as bad as GTA4's car handling. I would like to know what you drive actually. If you drive it at full speed and swing the wheel to full lock while yanking on the handbrake (as you would in, for the sake of argument, San Andreas) can you make it round a corner cleanly? Because my BMW 328 would slot you backwards through a shop window.
Si
Andrew - 03 Dec 2008 10:53 GMT >I would like to know what you drive actually. If you drive it at full >speed and swing the wheel to full lock while yanking on the handbrake >(as you would in, for the sake of argument, San Andreas) can you make >it round a corner cleanly? Because my BMW 328 would slot you >backwards through a shop window. The GTA handling isn't realistic no matter what speed you are doing, if they were realistic our roads would be strewn with wrecked cars.
What spoiled GTA4 for me was Burnout Paradise, it has way better graphics and infinitely better car control. GTA's dodgy physics and super blurrovision graphics ruined the experience for me. I really wish they had got for a less ambitious game engine, something like Saints Row and making it more fun.
 Signature Andrew, contact via http://interpleb.googlepages.com Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards, please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text. Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.
SimonH - 03 Dec 2008 11:33 GMT > On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:19:39 -0800 (PST), SimonH
> The GTA handling isn't realistic no matter what speed you are doing, > if they were realistic our roads would be strewn with wrecked cars. Ah, no argument. It is, however, *more* realistic than previous games in the series. Which is what I said.
> > ... It's different, > > sure, because it's more realistic and the new control scheme takes a > > little getting used to Paul Heslop - 03 Dec 2008 12:24 GMT > > On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:19:39 -0800 (PST), SimonH > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Ah, no argument. It is, however, *more* realistic than previous games > in the series. Which is what I said. yeah, i can't say the driving has ever been great, but I did get into driving in GTA4, except on two wheels. I got fed up of falling off, pretty much like real life :O)
 Signature Paul (We won't die of devotion) ------------------------------------------------------- Stop and Look http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/
Odd Bob - 03 Dec 2008 16:23 GMT >> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:19:39 -0800 (PST), SimonH >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > driving in GTA4, except on two wheels. I got fed up of falling off, > pretty much like real life :O) Motorcycles were my transportation of choice in SA. They may not have been realistic, but they sure were a lot more fun than in GTA4.
Only time I've ever ridden a real motorcycle was during a training course almost 20 years ago. I passed the course (barely) and got the endorsement on my license, but never got the bucks together to actually buy a bike. The endorsement has long since lapsed, and I'm too aware of my mortality to really be tempted to renew it and get a bike now...
-- Bob
Paul Heslop - 03 Dec 2008 18:04 GMT > >> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:19:39 -0800 (PST), SimonH > >> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > -- Bob I am awful in real life, on two or four wheels and even managed to cream a mother and child on my paper round when I was a lad by hitting them at full speed on my pushbike. I'm well dangerous on wheels :O)
saints row 2 bikes don't go faster or anything if you lean forward, but the cool thing is wheelies are easier and if you have a sword you can slice people as you ride past.
 Signature Paul (We won't die of devotion) ------------------------------------------------------- Stop and Look http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/
GP Hardy - 03 Dec 2008 12:44 GMT >... If you drive it at full speed and swing the wheel to full lock while >yanking on the handbrake (as you would in, for the sake of argument, San >Andreas) can you make it round a corner cleanly? Because my BMW 328 would >slot you backwards through a shop window. My Explorer is a lot like the Landstalker from SA - you don't "drive" it, you "guide" it.
Odd Bob - 03 Dec 2008 16:16 GMT SimonH <simon.hudson1@gmail.com> wrote in news:7f805486-0a2a-45fd-8e79-c92bba89c836 @w35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
>> On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 03:05:02 -0800 (PST), SimonH > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Si I have no idea how realistic GTA4's driving physics because there's no way in hell I would EVER drive like that in real life, especially not in traffic. If I tried driving like that in RL for five minutes, I'd probably wind up on CNN, just for the impressive pedestrian body count alone. And then you wouldn't be hearing from me again for at least thirty years, until I made parole...
On the infrequent occasions I drive sanely in the game, though, the physics seem quite realistic. :)
-- Bob
snark - 03 Dec 2008 21:33 GMT > I would like to know what you drive actually. If you drive it at full > speed and swing the wheel to full lock while yanking on the handbrake > (as you would in, for the sake of argument, San Andreas) can you make > it round a corner cleanly? Because my BMW 328 would slot you > backwards through a shop window. Not fair. Not fair at all. There's no way a console computer game is going to realistically simulate real driving. Pushing a thumbstick all the way to the right should in no way be compared to turning a steering wheel to full lock, and pressing a button should in no way be compared to yanking on a handbrake. Asking someone to accurately simulate driving a vehicle using a console controller is like asking someone to do needlepoint whilst wearing boxing gloves.
Phil Hibbs.
SimonH - 04 Dec 2008 09:20 GMT > > I would like to know what you drive actually. If you drive it at full > > speed and swing the wheel to full lock while yanking on the handbrake [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > simulate driving a vehicle using a console controller is like asking > someone to do needlepoint whilst wearing boxing gloves. I wish people would read and think about what I am saying. Usenet is as infuriating as it always was :)
The whole point is that it is *much easier* to simulate *more* realistic driving in GTA IV *than in any previous version of the game.*
And before you, or anyone else says it, *no*, I am not implying that you can't finesse the handling of a car in SA. What I am saying is that it is a lot easier and more realistic in IV. Some of this is down to the new control layout and some of it is down to the way the different vehicles respond to control input.
Paul H gets it, so I can't have been that oblique.
What we could argue (pointlessly) is which is more fun. There are clearly two camps here that will just have to agree to differ.
Si
snark - 05 Dec 2008 10:40 GMT > I wish people would read and think about what I am saying. Usenet is > as infuriating as it always was :) I did read it. I may have mis-interpreted it, but I did read it, and I did think about it. And I'm not Usenet, I'm a person, a fallible person. My mistake was probably in not going back and reading your *other* posts to get some context for your analogy.
Phil Hibbs.
|
|
|