> My question may sound strange, but I like playing the games
> chronologically, not necessarily in order like play FF 7 then FF 8. Now I
> know that some of the games were released in Japan differently than they
> were release here in the states so, chronologically, what is the order
> should they be played in?
North American versions of games simply weren't released. The numbered
releases are numbered in their original publication order. If I remember
correctly, FF Tactics was released between 7 and 8, although I may be
mistaken on that one.
> Also, is there a FF3 version for PS, I can't seem to find one?
The English version is in development, with no announced system or release
date.
Blaine
Chris V. wrote on 2004-03-07 09:18:
> I've recently bought my first PS 2 system and I my first games I want
> is the entire FF series. Right now I have FF 5, 6 (Anthology), 7, 8,
> 10,& Tactics and I plan on getting origins (FF1 & 2), Chronicles (FF
> IV),& IX within the next few weeks.
Nitpick, but _Tactics_ is not a *true* Final Fantasy game, just as
_Final Fantasy Adventure_ and _Final Fantasy Legend_ (I, II, III) are
not *true* Final Fantasy games. (The latter are actually American
releases of Seiken Densetsu and SaGa [I, II, III], respectively.)
However, if you overlook this nitpick, you also missed Final Fantasy
Mystic Quest. That was released between 4 and 5, I believe.
> My question may sound strange, but I like playing the games
> chronologically, not necessarily in order like play FF 7 then FF 8.
> Now I know that some of the games were released in Japan differently
> than they were release here in the states so, chronologically, what
> is the order should they be played in?
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. They were numbered in order of their
release. Remember, these are primarily *Japanese* games. The American
releases are the exception in this case, not the rule.
> Also, is there a FF3 version for PS, I can't seem to find one?
Not that I know of, but I'm still wishing for a _Final Fantasy
III/Dragon Quest IV_ combo in the near future.
Of course, my ham dinner might sail around the room first.

Signature
Zarggg
KeyID: 0xC00D540D
<http://www.zarggg.net/>
See <http://www.zarggg.net/contact.html> for contact information.
Rob Browning - 07 Mar 2004 19:38 GMT
>Chris V. wrote on 2004-03-07 09:18:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>not *true* Final Fantasy games. (The latter are actually American
>releases of Seiken Densetsu and SaGa [I, II, III], respectively.)
But FFT was originally FFT. Therefore, it is an FF game. Though not
part of the FF series.
Rob
ploovTeHSPaeMBLoKuR@charter.net

Signature
Owner of 2501 Netstalker Points awarded by Corwin of Amber, mainly
because Atma's just too damn attractive to get away from.
Gave 7499 Netstalker Points to Cypher because there's no such thing as
a good day on AGFF without JT bashing!
Owner of David Watson, rec.arts.anime.misc
"<rjz> i'm out
*** rjz has quit IRC (Quit: BitchX: its not your ordinary stick of
gum)
<Ramen> yeah, I'm kind of tired
*** Ramen has quit IRC (Quit: Tired)
<Corwin> homework time ;_;
*** Corwin has quit IRC (Quit: )
<Pluvius> Well that was gay."
--#ramenjunkie on EsperNet (I needed a new .sig quote)
> I've recently bought my first PS 2 system and I my first games I want is the
> entire FF series. Right now I have FF 5, 6 (Anthology), 7, 8, 10,& Tactics and
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Thanks in Advance
> Chris
With the exception of FFX and FFX-2, aren't all the FF games set in
different worlds/realities? I don't think that there is a chronology,
except for X and X-2...
W. Blaine Dowler - 07 Mar 2004 18:38 GMT
> With the exception of FFX and FFX-2, aren't all the FF games set in
> different worlds/realities? I don't think that there is a chronology,
> except for X and X-2...
This is correct. (Well, I don't know enough about the "Final Fantasy
Legend" series to say if those were sequels. I've never had a Game Boy.)
I assume the chronology he's talking about is the order the games were
created.
Blaine
Chris V. - 07 Mar 2004 21:10 GMT
>I assume the chronology he's talking about is the order the games were
>created.
>
>Blaine
pretty much. I heard that the first FF here was like FF4 in Japan, or something
like that.
I may be wrong, but the games are definately fun to play.
Chris
Dan Posluns - 07 Mar 2004 21:24 GMT
> >I assume the chronology he's talking about is the order the games were
> >created.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> something
> like that.
FF1 was the first. FF4 was the second, released here as FF2.
(SaGa 1 was released here as Final Fantasy Legend for the Gameboy in
between.)
Dan.

Signature
Dan Posluns - remove the obvious from my e-mail address to reply
http://www.danposluns.com
ICQ: 35758902
W. Blaine Dowler - 07 Mar 2004 21:33 GMT
> pretty much. I heard that the first FF here was like FF4 in Japan, or
> something like that.
With J for Japan, and NA for North America, the Nintendo releases were
FF1 J = FF1 NA (NES)
FF2 J = not released
FF3 J = not released
FF4 J = FF2 NA (SNES)
FF5 J = not released
FF6 J = FF3 NA (SNES)
After that, Sony started releasing them with the correct (Japanese) numbers.
The numbers on the PlayStation editions are correct, although FF1 and FF2
were revamped with superior (to the original) graphics and sound.
Blaine