 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups Platforms PCXboxPlayStationNintendoGames ActionStrategyRole Playing GamesSimulatorsSport Games |
Game Forum / Role Playing Games / Final Fantasy / November 2005Do lower IQ's equal support for Bush?
Just curious(n. the dead dude.) Politicians are getting SO bad, in general, that the "smart" people just gave up going to the polls. Take it FWIW. > Just curious(n. the dead dude.) in general....sure. >> Just curious(n. the dead dude.) > in general....sure. Says the wise old student. > >> Just curious(n. the dead dude.) > > > in general....sure. > > Says the wise old student. As P.T. Barnum said, "There's a new bush backer born every minute". > > >> Just curious(n. the dead dude.) > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > As P.T. Barnum said, "There's a new bush backer born every minute". Bush backer, bush whacker.......take your pick. >> >> Just curious(n. the dead dude.) >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > As P.T. Barnum said, "There's a new bush backer born every minute". As D.S. Patton said, "Just because somebody calls bullshit on you, it doesn't make them a Bush backer." If you'll take a look at the grammar employed by those on the net who support Bush, I think you'll have your answer. > Just curious(n. the dead dude.) >If you'll take a look at the grammar employed by those on the net who >support Bush, I think you'll have your answer. See, that's what makes you stupid. You think grammar counts for something in the real world, therefore you'll vote for the most eloquent speaker rather than the person that's more suited to the job. >> Just curious(n. the dead dude.) >> If you'll take a look at the grammar employed by those on the net who >> support Bush, I think you'll have your answer. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >>> Just curious(n. the dead dude.) It's not the grammar. It's the ability to communicate an idea. That's what grammar is all about. When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you can tell immediately that he cannot communicate in a manner that is understandable. Many people lacking formal education still use correct grammar even though they don't know the rules. > It's not the grammar. > When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you > can tell immediately that he cannot > communicate in a manner that is understandable. There is no Jr. behind the man's name. There is no Sr. behind his dad's name. That is a common stupid mistake made by libs. >> It's not the grammar. >> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > dad's name. > That is a common stupid mistake made by libs. Wrong. He was always junior. He hates it and wont use it. >>> It's not the grammar. >>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > He was always junior. > He hates it and wont use it. No it's not wrong. They have different middle names and therefore can't be Sr. and Jr. Never were. Never will be. >>>> It's not the grammar. >>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > No it's not wrong. They have different middle names and therefore > can't be Sr. and Jr. Never were. Never will be. I read about it a long time ago. He said it in his own words. He hated it and wouldn't use Junior. You are free to avoid it's use. I will use it. Junior he was, junior he is, in every way. An incompetent loser that has caused serious damage to America. It will take years for the next president, be he or she Democrat or Republican, to repair the damage. Only 37-38% of Americans still support him. Why are you still supporting a loser? >>>>> It's not the grammar. >>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Only 37-38% of Americans still support him. > Why are you still supporting a loser? Many good things he has done but there is a LOT that I bitch at him for. Mainly the border situation. He pissed me off kowtowing to vincente fox and his band of thieves when he was gov. here in Texas. He also plays too much footsy with the likes of Ted Kennedy. There are many polls and we can all choose the ones we like most. Any how, go on if you like. This is a football forum and I'd rather talk football here than politics. All politicians piss me off anyway. LOL! Time to let farmers and the like run things. Lawyers and their ilk have f.cked things up bad enough. hahaha! He was referring to family calling him junior. That is what he hated. He was never NAMED Jr. >>>>>> It's not the grammar. >>>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > He was referring to family calling him junior. That is what he hated. > He was never NAMED Jr. Junior he was, junior he is, in every way. >>>>>>> It's not the grammar. >>>>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > >Junior he was, junior he is, in every way. no, junior. >>>>> It's not the grammar. >>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >He said it in his own words. >He hated it and wouldn't use Junior. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffix_(name) Sons with a different middle name or initial are not called junior. An example is Ronald P. Reagan, the son of the late U.S. president, who is not titled junior because his middle name, Prescott, differs from his late fathers middle name, which was Wilson. This notwithstanding, a son may sometimes be called junior even if he is not titled as such, because Junior is a popular familial nickname in the United States. One instance of this is George W. Bush, who is nicknamed Junior by his family. Interestingly, the son of actor Lon Chaney, was billed by Hollywood as Lon Chaney, Jr. to capitalize on his fathers success, even though he had an entirely different birth name. >>>>>> It's not the grammar. >>>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Hollywood as Lon Chaney, Jr. to capitalize on his father's success, > even though he had an entirely different birth name. Thank You! >>>>>>> It's not the grammar. >>>>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] >> >Thank You! bush was called jr by people that knew no better.. they knew he was george bushs son...george bush.. so they figured he was jr and called him such. An easy mistake to make. > >>>>>>> It's not the grammar. > >>>>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > george bushs son...george bush.. so they figured he was jr and called > him such. An easy mistake to make. Mistake? the definition clearly states it is an allowed thing to do. >> >>>>>>> It's not the grammar. >> >>>>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > >Mistake? the definition clearly states it is an allowed thing to do. An allowed thing to do? You're allowed to call him Ho Chi Minh if you want, still doesn't make it correct. > >> >>>>>>> It's not the grammar. > >> >>>>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > An allowed thing to do? You're allowed to call him Ho Chi Minh if you > want, still doesn't make it correct. What an idiot. Picking on someone who calls him Bush Jr. is like picking on your buddy for calling his wife the "old lady" if she's younger than him. Totally moronic is the term that comes to mind. >> >> >> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:21:18 -0400, "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> >wrote: [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] >your buddy for calling his wife the "old lady" if she's younger than him. >Totally moronic is the term that comes to mind. I'm not picking on anybody. I'm just correcting you guys. Got something against being corrected? I would think that you'd be used to it by now. > >> >> >> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:21:18 -0400, "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> > >wrote: [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > something against being corrected? I would think that you'd be used to > it by now. You don't think the correctional system WORKS, do you? >> >> >> >> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:21:18 -0400, "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> >> >wrote: [quoted text clipped - 65 lines] > >You don't think the correctional system WORKS, do you? For some, it does. For you, it obviously didn't. I'm sure they'll put right back into the system next time you f.ck up, though. >>>>> It's not the grammar. >>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] >Only 37-38% of Americans still support him. >Why are you still supporting a loser? why are you sucking dumbocrat dick? >>>>>> It's not the grammar. >>>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > why are you sucking dumbocrat dick? You lose! Abusive foul language....the mark of a loser....just like Bush,Jr >>>>>>> It's not the grammar. >>>>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] >You lose! >Abusive foul language....the mark of a loser....just like Bush,Jr We all lost with Pornographer in thief Clinton. >>>>>>>> It's not the grammar. >>>>>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] >> > We all lost with Pornographer in thief Clinton. You lose again! You have no answer. You can't rebut the argument....so you bring up Clinton to divert from the loser who only has the support 0f 37-38% of Americans....you included. <snip> > We all lost with Pornographer in thief Clinton. Clever! Clever! Clever!  SignatureI'm so hip I have trouble seeing over my pelvis. I'm so cool you can keep a side of meat in me for months. >We all lost with Pornographer in thief Clinton. And now we have a mass murdering Christian baby killer. Who lost, again? --- http://www.ElmerFudd.US/ http://www.notserver.com/ http://sf.irk.ru/www/ot3/otiii-gif.html http://www.rightard.org/ http://www.thedarkwind.org/ http://www.scienTOMogy.info - More Tom Cruise than HBO >>We all lost with Pornographer in thief Clinton. > >And now we have a mass murdering Christian baby killer. Hey, he's killing plenty of muslim babies too. >Who lost, again? > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >http://www.rightard.org/ http://www.thedarkwind.org/ >http://www.scienTOMogy.info - More Tom Cruise than HBO >>We all lost with Pornographer in thief Clinton. > >And now we have a mass murdering Christian baby killer. > >Who lost, again? the chinese that were buying nuclear secrets from "Al & Billy's Used secret shop". > >>We all lost with Pornographer in thief Clinton. > > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > the chinese that were buying nuclear secrets from "Al & Billy's Used > secret shop". If you *really* believe that the military-industrial complex and it's security changes significantly, depending on who is president, then you're living in a vacuum. >>>>>>>> It's not the grammar. >>>>>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] >> >We all lost with Pornographer in thief Clinton. Wait a second, Clinton wasn't really a bad president. He is a contemptible human being though. >>>>>>>>> It's not the grammar. >>>>>>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > Wait a second, Clinton wasn't really a bad president. He is a > contemptible human being though. So true. Not to mention that many other presidents have cheated and are hailed as some of the best ever in office. Ryan >>>>>>>>>> It's not the grammar. >>>>>>>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] >So true. Not to mention that many other presidents have cheated and are >hailed as some of the best ever in office. JFK immediately comes to mind. I figure most of them abused their power of office to get some pussy on the side. Not James Buchanan. I'm pretty sure he was gay. >>>>>>>> It's not the grammar. >>>>>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] >> > We all lost with Pornographer in thief Clinton. Good strawman argument. Anyways, there's nothing wrong with what he did. He's human after all, and it's how he does his job, not how he runs his personal life. His personal life should be none of the public's buisness. Ryan >>>>>>>>> It's not the grammar. >>>>>>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] >it's how he does his job, not how he runs his personal life. His personal >life should be none of the public's buisness. That's true, but he shouldn't have lied about it in the hearing. >>>>>>>>>> It's not the grammar. >>>>>>>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > > That's true, but he shouldn't have lied about it in the hearing. Then, he did not have intercorse. heh Ryan "DarkSheer" <rdettl@______dundee.net> You're digging it round, when it aughta Be SQUARE >>>>>>>>>>> It's not the grammar. >>>>>>>>>>> When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > >Ryan so you're saying he didn't have discourse about intercourse? -- "People who read the tabloids deserve to be lied to" - Jerry Seinfeld "Education is the progressive discovery of our own Ignorance" - Will Durant "We are drowning in information, while starving for wisdom." - E.O. Wilson "the glass is not only half full the first half was delicious" --Me To Reply: Scrape off the end bits... > > It's not the grammar. > > When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > name. > That is a common stupid mistake made by libs. No it's not. It's a easy way to distinguish between the two, as opposed to spelling out their first names and middle initials. Anyone with half a brain would have figured that one out. >> > It's not the grammar. >> > When a dolt like Bush,Jr speaks you [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >Anyone with half a brain would have figured that one out. guess that leaves the libs out. >>If you'll take a look at the grammar employed by those on the net who >>support Bush, I think you'll have your answer. > >See, that's what makes you stupid. You think grammar counts for >something in the real world, therefore you'll vote for the most >eloquent speaker rather than the person that's more suited to the job. Seems to me like people voted for Bush because he _wasn't_ the most eloquent speaker, and they didn't really care whether or not he was suited to the job. So I guess Democrats think that good grammar counts for something, and Republicans think that bad grammar counts for something. At least the Democrats' position on this makes a bit of sense. Rob ploovTeHSPaeMBLoKuR@charter.net SignatureOwner of 2501 Netstalker Points awarded by Corwin of Amber, mainly because Atma's just too damn attractive to get away from. Gave 7499 Netstalker Points to Cypher because there's no such thing as a good day on AGFF without JT bashing! Owner of David Watson, rec.arts.anime.misc "There should be a rule that if you slack off while an American city is destroyed, and then your response is to fly around hugging people and making excuses, you have to stop being President. And if it happens again four years later, you _really_ have to stop." --Get Your War On (www.mnftiu.cc) 9/13/05 > >>If you'll take a look at the grammar employed by those on the net who > >>support Bush, I think you'll have your answer. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Republicans think that bad grammar counts for something. At least the > Democrats' position on this makes a bit of sense. Used car dealers generally use good grammar. >>>> If you'll take a look at the grammar employed by those on the net >>>> who support Bush, I think you'll have your answer. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Used car dealers generally use good grammar. And? Another moot point. Ryan >>>If you'll take a look at the grammar employed by those on the net who >>>support Bush, I think you'll have your answer. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >eloquent speaker, and they didn't really care whether or not he was >suited to the job. That's a hell of a leap in logic. >So I guess Democrats think that good grammar counts for something, and >Republicans think that bad grammar counts for something. At least the >Democrats' position on this makes a bit of sense. Interesting. You foist a completely illogical theory on usenet and declare it as fact. >>>>If you'll take a look at the grammar employed by those on the net who >>>>support Bush, I think you'll have your answer. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >That's a hell of a leap in logic. Well, I heard that some people voted for Bush because he "talks like a normal person," so it must be true. You know, just like how you heard that some people voted for Kerry because he talks like someone who's qualified to be the leader of the free world. Rob ploovTeHSPaeMBLoKuR@charter.net SignatureOwner of 2501 Netstalker Points awarded by Corwin of Amber, mainly because Atma's just too damn attractive to get away from. Gave 7499 Netstalker Points to Cypher because there's no such thing as a good day on AGFF without JT bashing! Owner of David Watson, rec.arts.anime.misc "There should be a rule that if you slack off while an American city is destroyed, and then your response is to fly around hugging people and making excuses, you have to stop being President. And if it happens again four years later, you _really_ have to stop." --Get Your War On (www.mnftiu.cc) 9/13/05 >>>>> If you'll take a look at the grammar employed by those on the net >>>>> who support Bush, I think you'll have your answer. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > that some people voted for Kerry because he talks like someone who's > qualified to be the leader of the free world. Heh. Ryan >>>>>If you'll take a look at the grammar employed by those on the net who >>>>>support Bush, I think you'll have your answer. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >Well, I heard that some people voted for Bush because he "talks like a >normal person," so it must be true. If you mean that he doesn't get up on the stage and scream like a baboon in heat or try to bullshit voters with about some medals that got thrown over a fence and some pictures of him fraternizing with the enemy, I would agree that that did make a lot of voters vote Republican when they otherwise would have voted Democrat. You know, just like how you heard >that some people voted for Kerry because he talks like someone who's >qualified to be the leader of the free world. > See, that's what makes you stupid. You think grammar counts for > something in the real world, therefore you'll vote for the most > eloquent speaker rather than the person that's more suited to the job. Like Kerry and Gore. They're smarter than us, you know. 'Course, you have only the 'liberal' arts educational apparatus to blame for the fact that grammar skills have gone downhill. Whole English and the culture of 'no wrong answers'...unintended consequences on line one... SignatureKimi Raikkonen on naida Hyllyä ajometsästyksen johtaja http://www.opensecrets.us/ http://damonscotthynes.blogspot.com/ Marny Stanier Midkiff: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheMarnyStanierAppreciationSociety/ This is one college teacher who believes there ARE wrong answers and that the nuts and bolts of the language should be mastered. And it's usually the Republican kids with the W buttons on their handbags (although we're seeing fewer and fewer of those) that protest our high standards. But usually because of higher skepticism toward educational types, a skepticism I don't necessarily find ill-founded. But the phenomenon of the Righty whining about my insistence they study and read is about what I expected to see. > 'Course, you have only the 'liberal' arts educational apparatus to blame for > the fact that grammar skills have gone downhill. Whole English and the > culture of 'no wrong answers'...unintended consequences on line one... > This is one college teacher who believes there ARE wrong answers and > that the nuts and bolts of the language should be mastered. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > But the phenomenon of the Righty whining about my insistence they study > and read is about what I expected to see. OH, STFU already, you elite-ist whiner. SignatureYrs., Ike ******************************************************** WE ARE PENN STATE! ******************************************************** >This is one college teacher who believes there ARE wrong answers and >that the nuts and bolts of the language should be mastered. > >And it's usually the Republican kids with the W buttons on their >handbags (although we're seeing fewer and fewer of those) that protest >our high standards. Ebonics? > This is one college teacher who believes there ARE wrong answers and that > the nuts and bolts of the language should be mastered. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >> the culture of 'no wrong answers'...unintended consequences on line >> one... Top-posting college teacher. Hmmm... |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.