Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Platforms
PCXboxPlayStationNintendo
Games
ActionStrategyRole Playing GamesSimulatorsSport Games

Game Forum / Role Playing Games / EverQuest / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Caster's Realm: Who Deserves New Content

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mike Shea - 26 Sep 2005 21:33 GMT
Caster's Realm: Who Deserves New Content

We have all bathed in the dark waters of the Uber vs. Causal bloodwar.
We have all seen expansions in the past and questioned their target
audience. High-end raiders look at expansions like Legacy of Ykesha
scratching their heads and angered at the lack of high-end raid mobs.
Single group hunters look at expansions like Planes of Power and Gates
of Discord wondering what dark god they must worship to access more
than 25% of the expansion. Today we will look at SOE's focus with each
expansion and ask ourselves who deserves new content.

The title of this article is already misleading. The answer, of course,
is 'everyone'. We all play this game and we all pay our $9 to $15 a
month. We all expect to receive entertainment for our money and thus
our money is wasted if we spend it on a game, or an expansion, that is
of little use to us.

Hundreds of thousands of Everquest players each play in a particular
style. We might try to group these players by level or class or
playstyle but none of us plays exactly the same way or for the same
reason as others. We all have a set amount of time we play and we all
have things we enjoy doing. For the most part, Everquest offers many
different ways to play that might be vastly different from one another.
Consider those who tradeskill and play the market in the bazaar to
those who lead groups of 54 hunters against the demon kings of Kuua.

These differences become apparent when one asks another to define a
'raider' or a 'casual player'. Some consider raiders to be those
fighting Grummus in Plane of Disease. Others consider raiders only
those at the highest end of the game (post Overlord Mata Muram at the
time of this writing). One can easily begin slicing up these broad
categories into dozens or hundreds of smaller categories.

Problems arise when players begin to think that they are the largest
populous of Everquest and demand that new content and new expansions
focus nearly entirely on them. I have heard players say that SOE should
only release expansions with raids harder than the previous. Following
this logic, every raid in Dragons of Norrath would be harder than
Overlord Mata Muram. I have heard other players say that SOE should
release expansions with content only for those between levels 25 and 50
and exclude high-end raids completely.

It is important to remember that whatever our play style, we are a
minority. No single group or play style holds a monopoly on the game.
We don't all mostly raid or mostly single group hunt. We aren't mostly
level 70 or level 50 or level 10. We don't all mostly want solo content
or encounters harder than Overlord Mata Muram. The Everquest population
is vast and wide.

When we look at various groups, however, we can see areas where
players, and the game as a whole, benefit from new content.

Overlord Mata Muram is the hardest single creature in the game. He is
still undefeated on some servers. On others, however, he has been
defeated and the groups who have hewn him down are now out of future
content. Where will they point their swords when the greatest threat
has fallen? This group certainly needs new raids to pacify their
hunger. From recent developer discussions, they are likely to find this
within Depths of Darkhollow.

What of lower power raiders? Many have yet to climb their way through
the Planes of Power but still enjoy hunting with a larger group. Some
might argue that enough lower power raid content exists to keep these
groups happy and they don't need new content. However, recent
expansions such as Gates of Discord, Omens of War, and Dragons of
Norrath have shown future advancements for all raids. Instancing,
lockout timers instead of rare spawns, multi-night raid progression,
and flag rewards all greatly improve over the traditional races to the
rare spawns we remember from our Kunark, Velious, and Luclin days. Are
lower power raiders not deserving of these new tools as well as the
high-end raiders?

Single group hunters above level 60 have seen a lot of content since
Planes of Power. Lost Dungeons of Norrath, Omens of War, and Dragons of
Norrath have given single group hunters some of the best and most
powerful hunts in Norrath's history. We have seen point-based loot
systems, group instanced dungeons, and focused adventure goals. There
is no lack of good and rewarding grounds from level 60 to 70. Lost
Dungeons scales all the way from level 20 to 70, ensuring a wide range
of hunting grounds without any risk of overcamped lands.

Still, as technology improves, as the SOE team becomes better at
creating new encounter styles and new paths for progression, should
these single-group hunters not reap the benefits?

What about low level players? Recently SOE revamped the original
tutorial, adding all new content from level 1 to 10 and a new set of
quests and missions from 10 to 20. Players below level 20 don't often
stay there very long so the requirement for continually improved level
1 to 20 content doesn't really exist. However, how can EQ continue
attracting newer players, even future hardcore raiders, if the lower
end content isn't representative of the best that SOE can offer? Depths
of Darkhollow offers new Monster Missions and spirit shrouds for all
levels from 5 to 70 so even a level 5 gets new content with this coming
expansion.

How about levels 20 to 50? This group has the largest bulk of existing
content from the old worlds. The complaint of a lack of content at
level 20 to 50 is far surpassed by complaints that zones remain empty
for weeks from a lack of players willing to hunt there. Lost Dungeons
offers the best instanced content from level 20 to 50. The task system
of Omens of War offered a moderately useful way to solo from level 20
to 50, but not nearly as well as other games allow. Again, the Monster
Missions and Spirit Shrouds open up a lot of possibility for level 20
to 50 hunters.

What about other play styles? There has been a strong tradeskill
community for a long time who constantly and continually requires new
content. While some expansions offered better benefits than others,
every expansion has had some new direction for tradeskills.

Everquest's players travel in dozens of different paths yet all of us
desire new content. While it is easy to declare that one expansion or
another was a 'casual' or 'Raid' expansion, each expansion really holds
benefits for all groups. The more recent expansions including Omens of
War, Dragons of Norrath, and the upcoming Depths of Darkhollow include
features and content for many if not most of these play styles. SOE
focuses Everquest on the wide variety of play styles such as raiding,
single grouping, tradeskills, adventures, missions, and quests. It is
this variety that makes Everquest as strong a game as it is.

Loral Ciriclight
30 August 2005
loral@loralciriclight.com
Faned - 26 Sep 2005 23:51 GMT
<mshea01@gmail.com> wrote:

> It is important to remember that whatever our play style, we are a
> minority.

You are flat out wrong.  The irony is that it is your egocentric viewpoint,
the same thing you attempt to admonish everyone else not to display, that
leads you to being wrong.  =P
42 - 27 Sep 2005 00:33 GMT
> <mshea01@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the same thing you attempt to admonish everyone else not to display, that
> leads you to being wrong.  =P

Right, we all know most people play exactly like Faned. You know, hard
core raiding 3-boxers in an endgame guild.

/smirk
Faned - 27 Sep 2005 20:16 GMT
<nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
> > <mshea01@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Right, we all know most people play exactly like Faned. You know, hard
> core raiding 3-boxers in an endgame guild.

No, most don't.  There's a far larger segment of the population that doesn't
raid nearly as much.  Like Loral.  Who still raids.
Mark Rafn - 27 Sep 2005 20:41 GMT
>> > <mshea01@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > It is important to remember that whatever our play style, we are a
>> > > minority.

>> > You are flat out wrong.  The irony is that it is your egocentric viewpoint,
>> > the same thing you attempt to admonish everyone else not to display, that
>> > leads you to being wrong.  =P

<nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>> Right, we all know most people play exactly like Faned. You know, hard
>> core raiding 3-boxers in an endgame guild.

>No, most don't.  There's a far larger segment of the population that doesn't
>raid nearly as much.  Like Loral.  Who still raids.

You're both right (or wrong, as the case may be).  Loral, it's simply not true
that Sony can't come up with categories broad enough to cover 51% or more of
the customer base.  It MAY be true that the common stereotypes (high-end 25+
hour/week raider and sub-70 casual) are not a majority.  Faned, arguing this
point as a "you're flat-out wrong" is not very helpful, and not true unless
you define terms more clearly.

My take on the whole argument: nobody "deserves" new content.  SoE makes
business decisions based on what they can produce in a given time for a given
budget, that they think enough people will buy to make it worthwhile.  Players
buy and play if they think it'll be a net positive on their happiness.

The decision Sony makes on what players are willing to buy does NOT boil down
to categorizing every account as one of N buckets, and writing features that
cater to each bucket proportional to it's revenue.  It is (or it would be if I
were King) far more nuanced than that.  They have to guess what will sell in
light of both lying/confused customers (who think they want something and
scream loudly about it, but won't be happy if they actually get it), a large
group of hard-to-categorize customers (former raiders, high-end casual, family
midlevel raiders, etc.), and the fact that there's a lot of crossover and
mobility in the customer base.
--
Mark Rafn    dagon@dagon.net    <http://www.dagon.net/>  
the wharf rat - 27 Sep 2005 21:32 GMT
>The decision Sony makes on what players are willing to buy does NOT boil down
>to categorizing every account as one of N buckets, and writing features that
>cater to each bucket proportional to it's revenue.  It is (or it would be if I
>were King) far more nuanced than that.  

    Ha ha:

    Director or Marketing to Development: "Dark elfs are cute.  Do
something with dark elfs in it.  Ummm, and maybe, like, a dragon
or something..."

    Development: "But..but..."

    Marketing: "Dark elfs.  Dragons.  Got it?  We already had the
print ads run."

    Development: "Grumble..."
Faned - 28 Sep 2005 00:57 GMT
<wrat@panix.com> wrote:

> >The decision Sony makes on what players are willing to buy does NOT boil down
> >to categorizing every account as one of N buckets, and writing features that
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>     Development: "Grumble..."

A scene repeated in game houses across the world every day.   =)
D.J. - 28 Sep 2005 16:13 GMT
] Right, we all know most people play exactly like Faned. You know, hard
] core raiding 3-boxers in an endgame guild.
]
] /smirk

Or like myself, I have no time, nor inclination, to raid.

JimP.
Signature

http://www.linuxgazette.net/ Linux Gazette
http://crestar.drivein-jim.net/ September 8, 2005
http://www.drivein-jim.net/ July 31, 2005: Drive-In movie theatres
http://poetry.drivein-jim.net/ poetry blog March 12, 2005

Larry Lard - 28 Sep 2005 17:31 GMT
[snip]
> It is important to remember that whatever our play style, we are a
> minority. No single group or play style holds a monopoly on the game.
> We don't all mostly raid or mostly single group hunt. We aren't mostly
> level 70 or level 50 or level 10. We don't all mostly want solo content
> or encounters harder than Overlord Mata Muram. The Everquest population
> is vast and wide.

I remember many years ago (I think before Luclin, definitely before
PoP) we were told that 'the majority' of accounts had 'at least' one
character over level 50. Given that levels tend to rise over time
(discuss!), we can then say that 'we' are 'mostly' over level 50 with
at least one character.

Signature

Larry Lard
Replies to group please

BKOFOED@YAHOO.com - 29 Sep 2005 03:40 GMT
> [snip]
> > It is important to remember that whatever our play style, we are a
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Larry Lard
> Replies to group please

and what of us poor 50+ soloist?
How much does Sony think about us other than how to get rid of us?
BKOFOED@YAHOO.com - 29 Sep 2005 03:42 GMT
> [snip]
> > It is important to remember that whatever our play style, we are a
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Larry Lard
> Replies to group please

and what of us poor 50+ soloist?
How much does Sony think about us other than how to get rid of us?
Lance Berg - 30 Sep 2005 02:03 GMT
> [snip]
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> (discuss!), we can then say that 'we' are 'mostly' over level 50 with
> at least one character.

I have several characters over 50.  I find, however, that I eventually
tire of them somewhere in that range, or especially when I get up to the
highest level, and start over.  Despite having 3 level 65s, and a half
dozen more in the 50-60 range, I've spent most of my time in the 1-50
range, and will continue to do so.  (The 65's all are "hit the wall"
characters, I quit them before the 66-70 game was introduced... now if I
ever take a character up past 60 again, I'll be likely to go to 70, and
THEN get bored with him)

Why?  Because I don't like raiding, and as you level up, more and more
thats where the game takes you.

As long as they continue to produce more content for high levels that
involves raiding, and more content for low levels that involves soloing
and small groups, I'll keep tiring of the high level and starting new
characters to try new angles on the lower level game.

Trouble is, rather than make the low end more interesting, they seem to
have tried to make it fly by faster, boosting exp and providing better
gear and so forth at the low end, so you just fly thru it.

And the other problem is, fewer and fewer players seem to be playing
that low end game, and those who -are- doing it are mostly speeding thru
as quickly as possible, so its hard to get interesting groups to go do
different things; if you don't want to do Tutorial>Kurns>PC>DSP you'd
better be good at soloing.  Variations on the solo theme aren't nearly
as interesting as the vast number of class/style combinations you can
approach things with as a group.

Midi
Palindrome - 30 Sep 2005 08:36 GMT
<SNIP>

>Trouble is, rather than make the low end more interesting, they seem to
>have tried to make it fly by faster, boosting exp and providing better
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>as interesting as the vast number of class/style combinations you can
>approach things with as a group.

Yes, that's the state of the game in a nutshell, nowadays.  The
Tutorial seems to reflect this "blitz the lower levels" attitude,
because gtting to level 10 is like clicking your fingers. I have to
say the Tutorial was pretty interesting though, simply because (and
TAKE NOTE, SONY!!) it was fresh, new and (for once) it was for
low-level players.

When I got to PoK, I just couldn't face Paludal Caverns yet AGAIN, and
actually sent an ooc out asking if anyone knew of some other place to
go to  :D  It's as you say - hit Tutorial/Kurns/PC/DSP and ignore the
rest.  The other zones for characters of appropriate levels may as
well not exist.

At a tangent whilst not quite unrelated, one guy in PoK did a mini
quest early this week. He said he was going to be in a particular
zone, which his friend would give a clue to after he'd left, and first
player under 20 to find him got 15k.  He duly left, and his pal then
announced the clue:  "He's beside the Shady Swashbuckler!"  Some
baffled people in PoK were saying things like "Is this in a new zone?"
and "What expansion is this zone in?"  Good lord, I remember when this
was the most famous NPC in Everquest, heh.  The only movement in the
zones now is people using the Magus, and there ain't a group in sight.

Palindrome
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.