James Hicks <james@doesntlikespam.org> wrote in news:iaqce.33309$5F3.17237
@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
> And what's more, it seems like Sony have largely, if not completely,
> fixed SK-tanking balance.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Kuloth 70 Shadowknight, Povar [Guild Defunct]
I just recently canned EQ2 and went back to EQLive. I moved all my original
mid-level alts to Stromm. It does seem to be a lively place for all levels.
Btw, what is this SK-tanking balance to which you refer? How did they go
about that?

Signature
Rumble
"Write something worth reading, or do something worth writing."
-- Benjamin Franklin
Faned - 29 Apr 2005 16:20 GMT
> James Hicks <james@doesntlikespam.org> wrote in news:iaqce.33309$5F3.17237
> @news-server.bigpond.net.au:
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Btw, what is this SK-tanking balance to which you refer? How did they go
> about that?
They kept doing nothing until the SKs realized that they actually tanked
just fine. =P
Graeme Faelban - 29 Apr 2005 22:17 GMT
>> James Hicks <james@doesntlikespam.org> wrote in
>> news:iaqce.33309$5F3.17237 @news-server.bigpond.net.au:
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> They kept doing nothing until the SKs realized that they actually
> tanked just fine. =P
Lol, pretty much true.
We routinely use SKs and Paladins as tanks for anything but the toughest
mobs on raids, have done so for a long time now.
They did give them the useless mini-defensive. Was there something else?

Signature
On Erollisi Marr in <Sanctuary of Marr>
Ancient Graeme Faelban, Barbarian Soothsayer of 70 seasons
On Steamfont in <Insanity Plea>
Graeme, 28 Dwarven Mystic, 24 Sage, Retired
Aviv, 15 Gnome Brawler, 30 Provisioner, Retired