Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Platforms
PCXboxPlayStationNintendo
Games
ActionStrategyRole Playing GamesSimulatorsSport Games

Game Forum / Role Playing Games / EverQuest / October 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Best Path 1-60? (NOT AD)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Angelic Celtic - 12 Oct 2004 01:48 GMT
Hey guys,

I rolled up an alt Berserker. Got him to 16. Okay, he's twinked (CiC for
regen, solid weapons, decent AC, 20kpp worth of stuff aside of the CiC
and weapons) - not going to group him a ton. More to have a bit of fun
soloing..  I'm stuck at lvl 16 and looking for places to make good
experience.

1-4 = newbie zone
4-6 = Blackburrow
6-12 = Paludal Caverns
12-16 = Kurn's Tower
16-60 = ????

I tried going PC to do the soloing non-bandit camps, but i cant seem to
get past B2 as strangely enough on my server (Mith Marr) PC seems to be
near empty 95% of the time now and B2 is generally vacant at the times
that I play. I don't particularly want to fight the Phlargs because even
though I have the CiC they still hit me (hardish) and infect me with the
crud which literally takes away the effect that the CiC has on me (well
minimises it at best).

Since the only other character I've played up to a 'high' level (53) has
been a cleric (Ytoojae if you're on Mith Marr) I'm not too well versed
in the soloing path.

If anyone could advise a path to 60 (thats ideally where I'd like to
take the berserker) soloing I'd appreciate it.

Last place I tried was the Warrens where I met a white kobold that
conned dark blue to me at which point I decided to beat it to 70% quite
easily to where it cast Fear on me and I had half the zone on my tail
(empty zone otherwise) and I luckilly got to the exit before death. Not
fun!!

Thanks,

A.C.
@ndrew - 12 Oct 2004 11:56 GMT
> Hey guys,
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> If anyone could advise a path to 60 (thats ideally where I'd like to
> take the berserker) soloing I'd appreciate it.

You won't solo a Berserker to 60 ... if you had wanted a class that
could solo you should have rolled a wizard, necro, druid or Bard.  The
Berserker is definately not a solo class.  I know I have one.

regards

@ndrew
Angelic Celtic - 12 Oct 2004 13:37 GMT
> You won't solo a Berserker to 60 ... if you had wanted a class that
> could solo you should have rolled a wizard, necro, druid or Bard.  The
> Berserker is definately not a solo class.  I know I have one.

Yes, I realise wizard, necro, druid and bards are the main soloers.
Although, I have a friend who in the past three years has soloed a
paladin from 1 to 55 but obviously the game has changed since he was in
his early ages.

I know I can get him to at least 24 as thats where my Paladin is at -
but I did that a few months ago when it was still easy to get to the
other side of PC and he could heal himself.

Matt
Graeme Faelban - 12 Oct 2004 14:56 GMT
Angelic Celtic <youwish@suckme.beautiful> wrote in news:416BD014.5080607
@suckme.beautiful:

>> You won't solo a Berserker to 60 ... if you had wanted a class that
>> could solo you should have rolled a wizard, necro, druid or Bard.  The
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> but I did that a few months ago when it was still easy to get to the
> other side of PC and he could heal himself.

You can solo just about any class that high, and higher, I've soloed my
warrior to 32 so far, with a few groups here and there, but 90% soloing.

Lance can probably better answer your Berzerker question though, I have
not tried one yet.

Signature

On Erollisi Marr in <Sanctuary of Marr>
Ancient Graeme Faelban, Barbarian Prophet of 67 seasons
Tainniel Fleabane, Halfling Warrior of 32 seasons
Giluven, Wood Elf Druid of 29 seasons
Graeniel, High Elf Enchanter of 25 seasons

Corey - 12 Oct 2004 18:03 GMT
> Angelic Celtic <youwish@suckme.beautiful> wrote in news:416BD014.5080607
> @suckme.beautiful:
>
> You can solo just about any class that high, and higher, I've soloed my
> warrior to 32 so far, with a few groups here and there, but 90% soloing.

That'll stop at about level 40.  You'll find that with your warrior, at
high levels, soloing anything but a light blue is near impossible.  With
really twinked up gear, you may be able to solo to 50.  Even then the xp
will be so SLOW.  My suggestion, make good friends with a cleric now.
Grouping is fun, especially with people you are familiar with, or that are
good players.  Sony gives really nice xp bonuses for groups now, too.
Graeme Faelban - 12 Oct 2004 21:18 GMT
>> Angelic Celtic <youwish@suckme.beautiful> wrote in
>> news:416BD014.5080607 @suckme.beautiful:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> with, or that are good players.  Sony gives really nice xp bonuses for
> groups now, too.

Given that my warrior is just a twink that I play once in an extremely
long while, I am not terribly worried about that.

Signature

On Erollisi Marr in <Sanctuary of Marr>
Ancient Graeme Faelban, Barbarian Prophet of 67 seasons
Tainniel Fleabane, Halfling Warrior of 32 seasons
Giluven, Wood Elf Druid of 29 seasons
Graeniel, High Elf Enchanter of 25 seasons

Mary Poppins - 12 Oct 2004 14:47 GMT
andrewratinternodedotondotnet (@ndrew) wrote in
<416bbd0a@duster.adelaide.on.net>:

>> Hey guys,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
>@ndrew

Why wouldn't a Beastlord be a good choice?
Signature

-Mary "I have no intention of making a spectacle of myself thank you."
Poppins

Graeme Faelban - 12 Oct 2004 15:09 GMT
> andrewratinternodedotondotnet (@ndrew) wrote in
> <416bbd0a@duster.adelaide.on.net>:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Why wouldn't a Beastlord be a good choice?

He did not say it would not be a good choice.  He also did not mention
shaman, which solo just fine all the way to 70.

Signature

On Erollisi Marr in <Sanctuary of Marr>
Ancient Graeme Faelban, Barbarian Prophet of 67 seasons
Tainniel Fleabane, Halfling Warrior of 32 seasons
Giluven, Wood Elf Druid of 29 seasons
Graeniel, High Elf Enchanter of 25 seasons

Jeff Lindholm - 12 Oct 2004 21:08 GMT
>> Why wouldn't a Beastlord be a good choice?
>
> He did not say it would not be a good choice.  He also did not mention
> shaman, which solo just fine all the way to 70.

Had to make a short comment on shaman, a level 70 shaman on FV solo'ed
rumblecrush last night. Took him about 10 minutes. So this should reinforce
the shaman is a good soloer :)
Graeme Faelban - 12 Oct 2004 21:21 GMT
>>> Why wouldn't a Beastlord be a good choice?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> rumblecrush last night. Took him about 10 minutes. So this should
> reinforce the shaman is a good soloer :)

Got a link to any info posted about that particular effort?

Signature

On Erollisi Marr in <Sanctuary of Marr>
Ancient Graeme Faelban, Barbarian Prophet of 67 seasons
Tainniel Fleabane, Halfling Warrior of 32 seasons
Giluven, Wood Elf Druid of 29 seasons
Graeniel, High Elf Enchanter of 25 seasons

John Henders - 14 Oct 2004 08:23 GMT
>>>> Why wouldn't a Beastlord be a good choice?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> rumblecrush last night. Took him about 10 minutes. So this should
>> reinforce the shaman is a good soloer :)

>Got a link to any info posted about that particular effort?

He had to have help pulling and killing the 4 dark masters on this one
I'm sure.

Signature

 Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
           GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v
                b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*

-martin - 14 Oct 2004 12:39 GMT
> >> Had to make a short comment on shaman, a level 70 shaman on FV solo'ed
> >> rumblecrush last night. Took him about 10 minutes. So this should
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> He had to have help pulling and killing the 4 dark masters on this one
> I'm sure.

Wrong mob.   Rumblecrush has no triggers, or time period for spawn/despawn

The point does remain however, about pulling RC as a solo shaman, through
all his guards..

-m
Faned - 14 Oct 2004 13:05 GMT
<nospam-villa_nospam_@cheerful.com> wrote:
> > In <Xns9580921904AD9richardrapiernetscap@130.133.1.4> Graeme Faelban
> <RichardRapier@netscape.net> writes:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> The point does remain however, about pulling RC as a solo shaman, through
> all his guards..

Not that I've ever tried it, but it might be possible to zone into VT and
back out and fight him on his spawn point without aggroing the others.
Aggro range seems reduced somewhat at 70, but not sure it would be enough
for that.
Lance Berg - 13 Oct 2004 02:06 GMT
>>Hey guys,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> could solo you should have rolled a wizard, necro, druid or Bard.  The
> Berserker is definately not a solo class.  I know I have one.

Twinked out with regen gear, a berserker solos better than most melee
characters up into the mid 50s; basically a regenning zerker can take
anything DB that he can single pull and that isnt' immune to stun; bonus
points for killing casters, who waste a -lot- of DPS on casting spells
you interrupt before they go off.

Above 55 or so things slow down dramatically and viable targets start to
vanish, as 55+ mobs are all immune to your stuns, and the normal model
where mob DPS goes up faster than PC mitigation also applies.

I soloed at least half of every level except a few in the 18-24 range,
which I think I blew thru in an afternoon grouped in PC, and while I'll
grant you it doesn't compare to the solo classes you name, its really a
lot better than soloing a warrior, cleric, enchanter (all classes I've
solo'd as well) and on a par, more or less, with soloing a shaman; the
shaman can take harder targets but the berserker's kill rate on easier
targets is much higher.

Lets see, these were my principle stops as I recall them:

Tutorial
Everfrost (getting newbie armor drops)
Blackburrow
Crushbone
Kurns
Paladul Phlargs
Paladul Bandits in group
Paladul Bandits solo
Echo Caverns
Gunthak Beach grouped
Gunthak Beach solo
Gunthak tunnels
Dulak scouts
Dulak warehouses
Dulak ships grouped
Dulak ships solo
POJ grouped
POJ solo
Velks
POJ second floor
Chardok grouped
Chardok exit solo
Griegs Grouped
Valor Grouped
Torment Grouped

I definately did a lot of other zones on the way up, but those were my
principle sources of exp.  The Grouped items indicate places where I
wasn't able to effectively solo at first, but was able to group, and
after leveling once or twice could solo.

I also did a fair number of LDoN's, but rarely found them decent exp
compared to what I was doing... unless I was soloing in them, but that
was never more than a few mobs, because after the first few I'd
inevitably end up with multiples I couldn't handle.

At 58 I can still solo downstairs in POJ and chardok exit, but the exp
rate is pretty slow, I can't yet solo Griegs and can't even tank at all
in Torment (every other place on the list where it says group I was MT
about half the time)

My current soloing zone is... hmm, I forget what its called, the zone
underneath LOIO.  Veksar?  But thats such a long trip that I just as
frequently either do POJ or just hang out and chat with folks in POK
while LFG.

Honestly, I might have topped out on the class, because my inability to
solo well means I stay LFG more, and at the same time I'm getting far
far fewer invites; under 50 I could get a group in 10 minutes or less
almost always, now I'm lucky to see an invite within two hours.  When I
could solo, LFG didn't bother me at all, because I was busy anyway, and
could group or not, no big deal.  Now that soloing is inconvienient and
grouping takes forever to arrange, my interest in the class is seriously
starting to wane.

Grage, 58 Zerker, Luclin
Annie Benson-Lennaman - 13 Oct 2004 19:07 GMT
> Honestly, I might have topped out on the class, because my inability to
> solo well means I stay LFG more, and at the same time I'm getting far
> far fewer invites; ........  Now that soloing is inconvienient and
> grouping takes forever to arrange, my interest in the class is seriously
> starting to wane.

   And let the topic drift start... now!

  Just curious Lance.  Since you think you might have topped out your
zerker, any idea what your next project might be?  Is there any class that
you haven't topped out?  Please answer in five thousand words or more.
Unless you don't feel like it of course, then don't answer at all.

Signature

Annie

AGE FAQ:
http://webpages.charter.net/lenny13/age.faq.htm
http://tinyurl.com/yvud6

Mirrored at:
http://www.derfy.net/agefaq.html

_______

If you can't figure out my email address, you're not supposed to write me.

Lance Berg - 19 Oct 2004 06:53 GMT
>>Honestly, I might have topped out on the class, because my inability to
>>solo well means I stay LFG more, and at the same time I'm getting far
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> you haven't topped out?  Please answer in five thousand words or more.
> Unless you don't feel like it of course, then don't answer at all.

Dunno, I'm sort of on haitus at the moment, haven't played EQ in over a
week now, other than logging in long enough to get a body  out of Fear
and just this morning to test invis vs charm (invis wins).

I was seriously considering going back to my bard, which I gave up on
due to RSI, but oddly the most recent patch doesn't seem to have
included the Melody thing they are playing with on patch.

I could go back to my mage and get him to 70, or my cleric, with the
same plan.

Or I have a 52 shaman I abandoned, not because I felt I'd topped out,
but because a friend wanted to start new characters on Firiona Vie.
I've heard bad things about high end shaman these days, though, and I'm
not sure I need to repeat my Berserker experience so soon.

I "topped out" my warrior at about 30, but he's been deleted.  Have an
enchanter at about there too, not as "topped out" by any means, but I'm
seeing a lot of unhappiness reported in the enchanter front these days.

I have a baby ranger I made to support my berserker with, he's 25 or
so... but another relatively unwanted class that can solo only
painfully?  I'm not so sure I want to continue with that line of approach.

I also have a 34 druid who again was created soley as a support
character, but I don't really see anything out there that makes me eager
to delve back into him.

Classes I haven't played past 20 or so:
Necromancer
Paladin
Beastlord
Shadowknight
Monk
Rogue
Wizard

Paladin strikes me as similar to berserker but with more "top end"
utility; I'd miss the sheer raw power though.

Shadowknight, at least at low levels, just isn't my cup of tea, I've
tried it a few times but never got past 11 or so.  Dunno why, and
perhaps trying it again I'd feel differently.

Beastlord is interesting, a jack of all trades sort of class, I only
played one, into the low 20s, shortly after luclin release.  Back then
there wasn't much to look forward to on the class, and I went back to
playing my cleric.  Perhaps I'd like it more now... and maybe with more
modern gear and spells I could get up out of the doldrums I seemed to
hit in the mid 20s.

Monk, well, it seems a poor solo choice, and not much wanted in groups;
thats not to say its not a good class, but it seems a poor choice for me
since I don't have a built in support group.

Rogue, well, take what I said about monks and double it in every
direction.  Really bad solo, really not wanted in groups, excellent
class, but really piss poor if you don't have guildmates or a regular
group to play with.  The "really not wanted in groups" part is of course
stupid, but it seems to be true anyway.

Necromancer is an interesting thought, I literally quit my last one in
the low 20s because he was too easy to play, too powerful.  I've played
powerful characters more now, though, and could probably cope better
with the seeming excess.

Leaving Wizard.  My very first EQ character was a wizard.  Played him to
level 4, never looked back.  Poor soloer till what, 29, 34?  Not wanted
in groups ever.   Again, without friends willing to put up with a class
that's percieved as substandard, I don't think so.

Oddly, I might just quit, I've been busy IRL and haven't logged into EQ
On any character in about two weeks, and looking forward I might be
offline for 6 months starting as soon as Thanksgiving.

Hell, if it wasn't for AGE I'd probably have quit already!

Grage
Annie Benson-Lennaman - 26 Oct 2004 09:39 GMT
  This is odd...  I just now saw your post pop up, though it looks like it
was written on the 19th.  Maybe my newsfeed is dropping the ball.  Or maybe
I just missed it somehow.

> Oddly, I might just quit, I've been busy IRL and haven't logged into EQ
> On any character in about two weeks, and looking forward I might be
> offline for 6 months starting as soon as Thanksgiving.

  I know it sure felt odd when I quit.  I mean, it still doesn't feel real
to me that I'm not playing any more.  I'm really enjoying CoH, but I am
hoping that EQII has the same draw for me just so that I can be be back in
Norrath, and enjoying it again.

> Hell, if it wasn't for AGE I'd probably have quit already!

  I'm just glad I haven't been hit with a ton of "You don't play EQ, so
stop hanging around here!" posts.

  So you might take your haitus as early as Thanksgiving, eh?  Just seems
like you just came back from your last one!  

Signature

Annie

AGE FAQ:
http://webpages.charter.net/lenny13/age.faq.htm
http://tinyurl.com/yvud6

Mirrored at:
http://www.derfy.net/agefaq.html
_______

If you can't figure out my email address, you're not supposed to write me.

Lance Berg - 26 Oct 2004 10:20 GMT
>    This is odd...  I just now saw your post pop up, though it looks like it
> was written on the 19th.  Maybe my newsfeed is dropping the ball.  Or maybe
> I just missed it somehow.

Yeah I noticed a whole bunch of my posts scattered back over several
weeks all got sent around the same time just recently; not sure what
that means.  The Net is still more art than science, I suppose.

>>Oddly, I might just quit, I've been busy IRL and haven't logged into EQ
>>On any character in about two weeks, and looking forward I might be
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> hoping that EQII has the same draw for me just so that I can be be back in
> Norrath, and enjoying it again.

Well I haven't quit... except that I haven't logged on at all in over a
month, and I notice I don't have any actual desire to do so at the moment.

I guess the difference between "not playing at the moment" and "quit" is
when I stop paying for the account, instead of just not logging on.

Of course, as we know, they don't actually wipe accounts, so I could
stop paying for a year and still log back on the next day... recidivism!

>>Hell, if it wasn't for AGE I'd probably have quit already!
>
>    I'm just glad I haven't been hit with a ton of "You don't play EQ, so
> stop hanging around here!" posts.

Yeah, you, get outta here and take your FAQ wit ya!  Stop spending all
our bandwith on intelligent readable commentary, we were hoping for a
higher noise to signal ratio when we heard you pulled the plug.

>    So you might take your haitus as early as Thanksgiving, eh?  Just seems
> like you just came back from your last one!  

Would be a couple months sooner than usual, if we get the go ahead to
tear down a building and put up a new one.  Just got thru with this
year's business yesterday, I'd appreciate my usual 3 months of slow work
days and down time... but I might be spending 16 hour days doing
constructovore instead.  That will also mean more than 6 months away
from the house... if you think paying $13 a month for an EQ account I'm
not using is silly, imagine how paying mortgage payments on a house
thats sitting empty more than half the year feels!  When it was only 3
months it wasn't so bad, but this is getting out of hand.

Grage
Annie Benson-Lennaman - 27 Oct 2004 19:31 GMT
> Well I haven't quit... except that I haven't logged on at all in over a
> month, and I notice I don't have any actual desire to do so at the moment.
>
> I guess the difference between "not playing at the moment" and "quit" is
> when I stop paying for the account, instead of just not logging on.

  True enough.  I actually stopped play for about two months before I
stopped paying.  Well, I did roll up a baby druid and try to play again for
a couple of hours, but felt such complete apathy to the project I actually
surprised I could ever feel that way about EQ.  

> Of course, as we know, they don't actually wipe accounts, so I could
> stop paying for a year and still log back on the next day... recidivism!

  This thought is the main one that gave me the strength to push that
"Cancel account" button.

> Yeah, you, get outta here and take your FAQ wit ya!  Stop spending all
> our bandwith on intelligent readable commentary, we were hoping for a
> higher noise to signal ratio when we heard you pulled the plug.

  I'm actually fairly ambivalent to the FAQ right now.  I really don't
think that it should be in hands of someone that doesn't play.  There may
very well be changes in this regard.  As for the rest, well, I've been
accused of being cranky lately, and maybe it's true.  


> Would be a couple months sooner than usual, if we get the go ahead to
> tear down a building and put up a new one.  Just got thru with this
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> thats sitting empty more than half the year feels!  When it was only 3
> months it wasn't so bad, but this is getting out of hand.

   You could get one of those huge Winnebego (sp?) things.  You know, the
house you can drive!  Get a satellite hookup for internet access on the
thing and you'd be in business (Um, not that I know if a satellite hookup
works for playing online graphical games).  Plus, you'd instill a sense of
horror on every driver behind you when they realize that you're ahead of
them.  Especially fun when there is no passing lane.

  There just doesn't seem to be a downside.

Signature

Annie

AGE FAQ:
http://webpages.charter.net/lenny13/age.faq.htm
http://tinyurl.com/yvud6

Mirrored at:
http://www.derfy.net/agefaq.html

_______

If you can't figure out my email address, you're not supposed to write me.

Tyas - 27 Oct 2004 20:09 GMT
>     You could get one of those huge Winnebego (sp?) things.  You know, the
> house you can drive!  Get a satellite hookup for internet access on the
> thing and you'd be in business (Um, not that I know if a satellite hookup
> works for playing online graphical games).  Plus, you'd instill a sense of
Well... I guess you can play through 3 seconds of lag. I've talked to
people who do. I wouldn't though.
Lance Berg - 28 Oct 2004 02:46 GMT
>>Yeah, you, get outta here and take your FAQ wit ya!  Stop spending all
>>our bandwith on intelligent readable commentary, we were hoping for a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> accused of being cranky lately, and maybe it's true.  
>  
I thought you had a volunteer on the hook there for a bit, too, someone
who found it odd that you are maintaining it when you don't play, and
thought he could do a better job, something like that?  Maybe you could
look a bit more incompetant, you know, like a husband claiming to be
unable to seperate clothes for the dishwasher?   Works for us!  Don't
tell Lenny I told you, though.

>     You could get one of those huge Winnebego (sp?) things.  You know, the
> house you can drive!  Get a satellite hookup for internet access on the
> thing and you'd be in business (Um, not that I know if a satellite hookup
> works for playing online graphical games).  Plus, you'd instill a sense of
> horror on every driver behind you when they realize that you're ahead of
> them.  Especially fun when there is no passing lane.

Lance's Top Ten Winebago Down Sides list

10) they cost more than my house.

9) ever drive one in the wind?  The sense of horror would be my own.

8) Gas milage about 3mpg, gas prices > $2 a gallon

7) Have to also have a vehicle to drive around when "home" is parked...
but I need hauling capacity of F150 or better.  Hard to tow one of those
behind the motor home

6) If I can have satelite internet in an RV I can have one in the
various booths I live in now.  Thus far it doesn't seem viable though, I
keep talking to friends who are trying it, eventually I think it may
start to make sense.  Don't need an RV for that, though.

5) Two adults, two pre teens, two cats... -you- stuff them all in an RV
and see how happy they are.  Its one thing when its just a few months in
cramped quarters and there's a house out there waiting.  Sell the house
and its -forever- in that little space.

4) Both adults and both kids are very kibble oriented, packrat types
all.  We'd need a second RV just for the books, and then there's toys to
consider.

3) I need a workshop to make swords in; my detached two car garage
(which will never again see a car inside) works fine since we're zoned
industrial.  Give up owning property and I'd have to lease work space
somewhere... probably cost me more than the mortgage payments

2) while I'd be able to park on festival grounds during the season when
fairs are open, that would still leave roughly 4 months a year when I'd
have to pay to park somewhere with hookups

1) I'd no longer be able to mock my friends who tried it (you knew I'd
get to the real reason eventually)

>    There just doesn't seem to be a downside.

Bonus: the down side (of steep grade roads).
Double Bonus: The up side (of steep grade roads)
Graeme Faelban - 28 Oct 2004 15:30 GMT
>>     You could get one of those huge Winnebego (sp?) things.  You
>>     know, the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I keep talking to friends who are trying it, eventually I think it may
> start to make sense.  Don't need an RV for that, though.

One type of internet connection that is getting more and more popular is
wireless.  You could at least dig around and see if there is something
like that available reasonably.  I have had mine for 3 or 4 years now,
and it's been awesome.  I get 1M down, 256k up.  Outages have been rare,
and they have been very responsive to tech support calls.  The one I have
is a local northern Colorado only company though.

Signature

On Erollisi Marr in <Sanctuary of Marr>
Ancient Graeme Faelban, Barbarian Prophet of 68 seasons
Tainniel Fleabane, Halfling Warrior of 32 seasons
Giluven, Wood Elf Druid of 29 seasons
Graeniel, High Elf Enchanter of 25 seasons

Lance Berg - 28 Oct 2004 16:03 GMT
>>>    You could get one of those huge Winnebego (sp?) things.  You
>>>    know, the
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> and they have been very responsive to tech support calls.  The one I have
> is a local northern Colorado only company though.

About halfway thru my "no phone line" time last year, I got a connection
working thru my Verizon phone.  I couldn't get EQ working... but it
wasn't till I got back to a real phone line and -still- couldn't log on
to EQ that I found out it was a setting in OE that was causing the
problem.  I suspect I could have used the verizon connection to play EQ
after all.

Sadly, I've now moved to Cingular, and I'm not at all sure the same is
true of this connection; had to move to it because of my wife's business
and some messed up problems with credit card acceptance, which
definately trumps my ability to play EQ.  On the surface, it appears
that it will cost me $75 a month for an unlimited connection, and that
seems a bit steep (on top of MMOG monthly fee) to play games.

But this was about the RV, not the connection; again, I can use a cell
phone without an RV just as easily as I could use satelite without an RV.

Plus I was just teasing Annie, which is a fine hobby I could reccomend
to anyone.

Grage
Graeme Faelban - 28 Oct 2004 17:32 GMT
>>>>    You could get one of those huge Winnebego (sp?) things.  You
>>>>    know, the
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> Plus I was just teasing Annie, which is a fine hobby I could reccomend
> to anyone.

Oh, yes, I realized the teasing part.  I was not addressing the RV issue
one way or the other.  The wireless internet I am talking about is not
via cell phones, and, at least mine, is significantly cheaper than $75 a
month.  Here is a link to a short description of what I am talking about,
this one in particular is only applicable in northern Colorado, but,
there may be other similar services where you are.  Figured it can't hurt
to bring it up, worst case, is the answer is no.

Signature

On Erollisi Marr in <Sanctuary of Marr>
Ancient Graeme Faelban, Barbarian Prophet of 68 seasons
Tainniel Fleabane, Halfling Warrior of 32 seasons
Giluven, Wood Elf Druid of 29 seasons
Graeniel, High Elf Enchanter of 25 seasons

Don Woods - 28 Oct 2004 23:07 GMT
> >    I'm actually fairly ambivalent to the FAQ right now.  I really don't
> > think that it should be in hands of someone that doesn't play.  There may
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> who found it odd that you are maintaining it when you don't play, and
> thought he could do a better job, something like that?

That would be me.  Though I don't know about the job being "better",
except that I'm sure Annie will think so because she doesn't have to
do it.  (My wife says dinner is always better when I cook, if only
because it means she doesn't. :-)  I hope to have my version ready
in time for the regular monthly posting (end of the month).  We'll see!

    -- Don.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Sukrasisx, Monk 45 on E. Marr       Note: If you reply by mail,
-- Terrwini, Druid 34 on E. Marr       I'll get to it sooner if you
-- Wizbeau, Wizard 32 on E. Marr       remove the "hyphen n s"
-- http://www.iCynic.com/~don   
Graeme Faelban - 29 Oct 2004 15:39 GMT
>> >    I'm actually fairly ambivalent to the FAQ right now.  I really
>> >    don't
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> in time for the regular monthly posting (end of the month).  We'll
> see!

Lol, my wife has the same attitude, except that I happen to agree with
her, as quite frankly, I am the better cook.  I won't compete with her on
baking though.

Signature

On Erollisi Marr in <Sanctuary of Marr>
Ancient Graeme Faelban, Barbarian Prophet of 68 seasons
Tainniel Fleabane, Halfling Warrior of 32 seasons
Giluven, Wood Elf Druid of 29 seasons
Graeniel, High Elf Enchanter of 25 seasons

Annie Benson-Lennaman - 29 Oct 2004 20:53 GMT
> That would be me.  Though I don't know about the job being "better",
> except that I'm sure Annie will think so because she doesn't have to
> do it.  (My wife says dinner is always better when I cook, if only
> because it means she doesn't. :-)  I hope to have my version ready
> in time for the regular monthly posting (end of the month).  We'll see!

  In fact, his version of the FAQ looks fantastic.  Alot more links than I
had, so it's easier to navigate.  And the new form allows for more detailed
answers/essays to be posted as separate documents, for the more
encyclopdiaic approach some seem to favor.

  I haven't seen the text only version, but I am very confident that it is
in very good hands.

Signature

Annie

AGE FAQ:
http://webpages.charter.net/lenny13/age.faq.htm
http://tinyurl.com/yvud6

Mirrored at:
http://www.derfy.net/agefaq.html

_______

If you can't figure out my email address, you're not supposed to write me.

Annie Benson-Lennaman - 29 Oct 2004 19:57 GMT
> I thought you had a volunteer on the hook there for a bit, too, someone
> who found it odd that you are maintaining it when you don't play, and
> thought he could do a better job, something like that?

  No, I'm the one that thought it odd that I was still maintaining it, and
thought/thinks that an active player would be inherently better at it.  And
the volunteer... um.. *lowers voice to a stage whisper* we've been
communicating.

> Maybe you could
> look a bit more incompetant, you know, like a husband claiming to be
> unable to seperate clothes for the dishwasher?   Works for us!  Don't
> tell Lenny I told you, though.

 AGE FAQ, my new version.

Question 1  What is Everquest?

Answer:  A game I no longer play.

The End.

  You mean sorta like that?

> Lance's Top Ten Winebago Down Sides list
>
> 10) they cost more than my house.

   But they *give* so much more in return!

> 9) ever drive one in the wind?  The sense of horror would be my own.

  So you get the thrill of a roller coaster and offroading in one big boxy
package.  Perfection.

> 8) Gas milage about 3mpg, gas prices > $2 a gallon

  If you don't waste gas, the terrorists win.  *Cue patriotic music*

> 7) Have to also have a vehicle to drive around when "home" is parked...
> but I need hauling capacity of F150 or better.  Hard to tow one of those
> behind the motor home

  This is silly.  Drive the 'bego everywhere!  Need to go the 7'll for
bubblegum?  'Bego time!  Want grab a burger at a drive thru?  'Bego time!
And maybe you can tear the roofs off a few Burger Kings.  

> 6) If I can have satelite internet in an RV I can have one in the
> various booths I live in now.  Thus far it doesn't seem viable though, I
> keep talking to friends who are trying it, eventually I think it may
> start to make sense.  Don't need an RV for that, though.

  You don't need an RV for that.  But it wouldn't hurt any.

> 5) Two adults, two pre teens, two cats... -you- stuff them all in an RV
> and see how happy they are.  Its one thing when its just a few months in
> cramped quarters and there's a house out there waiting.  Sell the house
> and its -forever- in that little space.

  You'd be just a camera crew away from having the next Big Hit on Fox.  I
know I'd watch.

> 4) Both adults and both kids are very kibble oriented, packrat types
> all.  We'd need a second RV just for the books, and then there's toys to
> consider.

  Easily solved.  CIHYS?

> 3) I need a workshop to make swords in; my detached two car garage
> (which will never again see a car inside) works fine since we're zoned
> industrial.  Give up owning property and I'd have to lease work space
> somewhere... probably cost me more than the mortgage payments

  I'm pretty sure RV's have roof.  Do your sword banging thing up there.
Sure, things might be a little cramped compared to what you are used to,
but you'd get a nice view, and plenty of fresh air.

> 2) while I'd be able to park on festival grounds during the season when
> fairs are open, that would still leave roughly 4 months a year when I'd
> have to pay to park somewhere with hookups

  No no no.  Don't park at all those four months.  Drive around seeing the
grandeur that is America/Canada/Mexico/South America.  Then, when you do go
the fairs, you feel like you've come home, instead of the other way around.

> 1) I'd no longer be able to mock my friends who tried it (you knew I'd
> get to the real reason eventually)
   
   A true friend would be able to find something else to mock them about.
That's what friendship is all about.

> Bonus: the down side (of steep grade roads).
> Double Bonus: The up side (of steep grade roads)

  Now you begin to get it!

Signature

Annie

AGE FAQ:
http://webpages.charter.net/lenny13/age.faq.htm
http://tinyurl.com/yvud6

Mirrored at:
http://www.derfy.net/agefaq.html

See the amazing Powerset Faq project now underway at
http://p079.ezboard.com/fcityofheroesunofficalforumsfrm10

Come visit the Unofficial CoH forums at
http://p079.ezboard.com/bcityofheroesunofficalforums

_______

If you can't figure out my email address, you're not supposed to write me.

Andy Pear - 12 Oct 2004 16:47 GMT
> Hey guys,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> 12-16 = Kurn's Tower
> 16-60 = ????

Possible zones:
16-20 Oasis of Marr
21-24 East Karanas
25-35 Marus Seru

I'm sure there are better places, but I if you're well twinked I would think
those zones should be doable.  I would suggest staying away from the Crag
Spiders in East Karanas.  They'll poison you and hurt your regen like the
Phlargs.  If you could find a way to get past the Phlargs, there's a series
of tunnels in Paludral not far from the Hollowshade Moor zone in.  The
tunnels have Sensai Mushrooms and those Luclin insect model creatures that
could take you up to level 23 or so.  They give good xp, but the insect
creatures might hit too hard to make soloing worthwhile.  You can usually
pull one at a time, but once in awhile there are two or three too close to
be separated.  It's a tough place to get in and out of without an
invisibility spell or gate.
KDragon - 12 Oct 2004 18:21 GMT
> Hey guys,
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> (empty zone otherwise) and I luckilly got to the exit before death. Not
> fun!!

It may not be fast, but my choices for soloing are:

16-20 Field of Bone (near Kurns, 24 is possible here as well)
20-25 Hollowshade Moor (on southern islands)
25-30 Swamp of No Hope (near the obelisk south of the FoB zone line)
30-35 Crazed Goblins in Butcherblock
35-50 Firiona Vie

My soloing (95% +) Warrior is currently in FV and 47. His equipment
however makes him a paper Warrior, but this is my attempt at a total
non-twink to see how far I can take him all by his lonesome.
Graeme Faelban - 12 Oct 2004 19:40 GMT
>> Hey guys,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> however makes him a paper Warrior, but this is my attempt at a total
> non-twink to see how far I can take him all by his lonesome.

For soloing in the low 30s, Crystal Caverns is great, that's where my
warrior has been most recently.  Prior to that, spent some time in
Runnyeye, also solo.

Signature

On Erollisi Marr in <Sanctuary of Marr>
Ancient Graeme Faelban, Barbarian Prophet of 67 seasons
Tainniel Fleabane, Halfling Warrior of 32 seasons
Giluven, Wood Elf Druid of 29 seasons
Graeniel, High Elf Enchanter of 25 seasons

bizbee - 13 Oct 2004 04:01 GMT
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:48:33 +1000 in
<416b2a37$1_1@news.iprimus.com.au>, Angelic Celtic
<youwish@suckme.beautiful> graced the world with this thought:

>Hey guys,
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
>A.C.
bizbee - 13 Oct 2004 04:09 GMT
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:48:33 +1000 in
<416b2a37$1_1@news.iprimus.com.au>, Angelic Celtic
<youwish@suckme.beautiful> graced the world with this thought:

>Hey guys,
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
>A.C.
Offhand, just because no one is ever there, give Befallen a look, but
be careful, the mobs are very social. Also, you can do the Aviaks in
SK to about 32, and pick up groups are pretty easy to get. Plus, you
can kill these suckers, then sell to them (vendor upstairs, he sells
to some, not to others--he'll deal with my necro Iksar, probably one
of the most deplorable characters in the game, but won't speak to my
elf bard), or at the very least, sit down among them and heal. No
faction hits.
Of course, if you get up to around 28 or so before they change it,
Dalnir is a hot zone (good to about 40), and is pretty sweet when no
one is around, or others are deep inside, or you have a good group.
Again, a replay of Befallen, the mobs are very social.
Lance Berg - 13 Oct 2004 04:59 GMT
> Offhand, just because no one is ever there, give Befallen a look, but
> be careful, the mobs are very social. Also, you can do the Aviaks in
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> one is around, or others are deep inside, or you have a good group.
> Again, a replay of Befallen, the mobs are very social.

Social mobs are not good news for a soloing berserker; we can
effectively "slow" one mob by stunning it every 12 seconds, but adds do
full damage, and we are at best relying on regen for heals during a
fight, and bandages in between (till 45 when we can get a clicky hp buff
that works like the famous clicky DW hat for paladins); this means
keeping the damage down to a managable level becomes very important...
and we have no root or other method of CCing already pulled mobs.

Finding targets that are either not social, or that are generally
seperated by enough distance to get single, is very important to a solo
berserker.

Grage, 58 berzerk, Luclin
Dies Deambulo - 13 Oct 2004 05:47 GMT
>> Offhand, just because no one is ever there, give Befallen a look, but
>> be careful, the mobs are very social. Also, you can do the Aviaks in
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
>Grage, 58 berzerk, Luclin
How about the Overthere for a 16.  Those along the ocean should be
good at that level.

Robert
Bank of America defines chintzy IMHO.  
Email for details.
                                    Robert Megee
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.