Annie Benson-Lennaman  said:
}Remington Stone wrote:
}> No, no, I think he means Internet Explorer makes him sad.  We're in
}> agreement about that.  It's perpetuating the idea that standards are
}> useless, and contributing to Bill Gates's quest to take over the world.
}   I'll grant that that is also a possible interpretation.  Still, one
}could make the point that it is designed that way because of people like
}me.  I could also just be a bit overly sensitive owing to the fact that
}while I know I don't have the best of skills, I still worked pretty hard on
}this and did my best.

I think you did a damn good job. :)

}> The web page is looking fine, barring a few typos. :)
}Where where WHERE?

Boo, I shoulda known I couldn't get away with just saying that. :)

section 2.9, second sentence, 'an instanced dungeons' doesn't work.
same section, last sentence 'the LDoN dungeon drop' should be drops.
2.13a needs a comma after stormhammer in the firs sentence
2.13d FiVi -is- a roleplaying...
second sentence parenthetical, 'more than on character' should be 'one'.
line 4, extends, not extents
2.14 'from other servers from other servers'
3.10 two occurences of 'VV' ?
lower down in 3.10, "Any "line command" has mismatched quotes
3.15 not a typo, but I believe plague rat tails sell for much less than
    2pp these days
3.15 'out grow' should be one word. comma after "spot". "merchants will
    play for them"
3.15b 1) another bizarre 'VV'
3.16 the comma in 'location, which' should go away
3.16 second block, "good for a you to know".  There's more than one of me?
3.21 under Roles, "pacify on MOB", how about 'one'?
3.21 under Crowd Control, "Bard's" should be plural, not possessive.
3.21 under Buffer, 'shamans can load a person down', add 'with buffs'
    maybe? unless we want shamans buffing people with Cripple for some
    reason?
3.21 under Debuffer, there's a poor lost homeless semicolon
5.1  'expletives', not 'explicatives'
5.2  "if you were to some basic research"
5.5  stray ; before 'Q'
5.5 near the end, "the letter OT" should clearly be plural
7.1 "from the one", or "than the one", not "to the one"
7.3 second sentence is a run-on, make 'The list is endless' separate.
7.3 last sentence, comma after 'game'.

I'll do the other half later.  Some of the commas may be a matter of
opinion.  Your call. :)

[39 Enchanter] Zinphandel Chianti <Alliance of Empires> (Gnome) Firiona

Both possible and correct. :)

Proper syntax is a strict requirement in any programming language. You
can't compile a C++ app with a single "}" missing... this is a good
thing. Its easy enough to write bug free software... the last thing we
need is a compiler that starts guessing what we intended to do.

Ideally if the page isn't HTML complient the browser should toss up an
error message, and render nothing. The web page author will quickly fix
the offending bugs if he wants his page viewed and the browers can be
small and efficient...

For some reason (mostly marketing/competition related) HTML went the
other way... you can write anything, and IE will do its best to figure
something out. The problem with this is multiple:

1) that it forces *all browsers* to bloat and perform guesswork on
pages. If IE can render some random html junk then "my browser has to
also" or IE will be a better browser from the end users perspective
because it renders more pages.

2) Worse, my compatibility code has to mimic IEs because if junk html
looks good in IE (which is what it was probably tested with) then if it
doesn't look good in my browser its because my browser guessed how to
interpret the junk html differently. This gave microsoft and advantage,
forcing everyone to keep up with them... lately their browser
marketshare is eroding... but they are still the dominant player by
default and will be for years to come.

3) Millions of malformed HTML pages float around the web and work just
fine in the bloated compatibility modes of the various mainstream
browsers... but as soon as someone tries to write a browser from
scratch, stright from the HTML spec they find it doesn't work
adequately...there is simply too much junk html on the web. This a
serious problem when the browser can't afford to be bloated and slow
(e.g. PalmOS browsers and other embedded systems like cellphones.

Nobody is expected to write 100% syntactically correct html. There are
web pages you can submit your page to that mechanically check it and
point out any errors.

Writing good html is actually very easy. Most violations that would
appear in a page that a novice would write are simply typos, improper
nesting, and orphan tags... all easily correctible even by that novice,
provided that they are told where to look.

You have to get into pretty exotic stuff before fixxing a page for
compliance gets 'hard'.

I think it looks great and everyone here owes you $5 or 100 plat if they play
on your server...
I didn't notice the typos but I'm surely no perfectionist :)))

Healea Sternstar - 59 cleric
Skila Windrunner - 57 ranger
Jennaii - 45 druid
Linni - 31 shaman
Stormfoot - 31 warrior
Deatha - 26 necro
Tholuxe Paells