 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups Platforms PCXboxPlayStationNintendoGames ActionStrategyRole Playing GamesSimulatorsSport Games |
Game Forum / Action Games / Doom / July 2004doom3 hardware requirements
Any ideas on the min and recommended hardware for the upcoming game ? http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/tech/weekly/2690450 > Any ideas on the min and recommended hardware for the upcoming game ? "äÍÉÔÒÉÊ íÉÎËÉÎ" <user@host.com> wrote... >> Any ideas on the min and recommended hardware for the upcoming game ? "someone" <someone@somewhere.com> responded: >http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/tech/weekly/2690450 and "Paul Smith" <Paul@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote: >Official minimum specs now up at: > >http://www.doom3portal.com/info/systemreq.php > >Google is your friend. And when Stan <iembracethedead@yahoo.co.uk> asked... >> I have a Radion 9700Pro with 2.4g P4 & 512 DDR. >> Will that be enough to run Doom III? >> >> Thanks in anticipation "EvilBill" <evilbill25@freeuk.com> responded: >Yeah, that'll be fine. >Check www.doom3portal.com for system reqs as released by id :) Could someone maybe post the specs hear so all thousands of us don't have it hit these websites? It'd be appreciated. > Any ideas on the min and recommended hardware for the upcoming game ? Official minimum specs now up at: http://www.doom3portal.com/info/systemreq.php Google is your friend.  SignaturePaul Smith, Yeovil, UK. *Replace nospam with smirnov to reply by e-mail* I have a Radion 9700Pro with 2.4g P4 & 512 DDR. Will that be enough to run Doom III? Thanks in anticipation Stan > Any ideas on the min and recommended hardware for the upcoming game ? > I have a Radion 9700Pro with 2.4g P4 & 512 DDR. > Will that be enough to run Doom III? No, you need a Dareon 42000XPert P7 & 3.14 gigo RAM. That's the strict minimum with all options off and 320×200 8 bits. nicolas patrois : pts noir asocial SignatureGLOU-GLOU P : Ouerk ! C'est dégueulasse, j'ai bu la tasse ! M : Panique pas... La mer est pleine de microbes, mais tellement dilués qu'ils sont inoffensifs... P : C'est ça... La mer, c'est de la merde homéopathique ! Oh God. Ask a reasonable question, get a fuckmook replying with a adolescent answer. Only Adults (Mentally) need reply. > > I have a Radion 9700Pro with 2.4g P4 & 512 DDR. > > Will that be enough to run Doom III? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > nicolas patrois : pts noir asocial qu'ils sont inoffensifs... > P : C'est ?a... La mer, c'est de la merde hom?opathique ! > Oh God. > Ask a reasonable question, get a fuckmook replying with a adolescent answer. > Only Adults (Mentally) need reply. Damn, we are still far away from the "octium" required game "prediction" that i made in some forum back in 1997 :) > > > I have a Radion 9700Pro with 2.4g P4 & 512 DDR. > > > Will that be enough to run Doom III? > > > > No, you need a Dareon 42000XPert P7 & 3.14 gigo RAM. > > That's the strict minimum with all options off and 320×200 8 bits. > Damn, we are still far away from the "octium" required game >"prediction" that i made in some forum back in 1997 :) Depends on how you look at it. Intel isn't selling a processor called the Octium, but we've got to be a couple of x86 generations ahead. Any processor expert got an idea of what x86 generation we'd be in if Intel had chosen to continue with that nomenclature? Would the slot procesors have been the 686s, with the return to socket 786? And 64bit processors would be 886? > > Damn, we are still far away from the "octium" required game > >"prediction" that i made in some forum back in 1997 :) [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Would the slot procesors have been the 686s, with the return to socket > 786? And 64bit processors would be 886? Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't all >=Penitum processors 64 bit internaly with 32 bit external bus? Aren't the new "64 bit" pocessors 64 internal/64 external? I don't see any game requiring this in the new future, unless maybe we start seeing 3d accelerators with a 64 bit bus interface. > Oh God. > Ask a reasonable question, get a fuckmook replying with a adolescent answer. > Only Adults (Mentally) need reply. Hey guy, it's not hard to find this info on the web, just search a little in the many doom community web sites. If you can't search it by yourself... damn you won't survive 2 seconds in Doom 3. nicolas patrois : pts noir asocial SignatureGLOU-GLOU P : Ouerk ! C'est dégueulasse, j'ai bu la tasse ! M : Panique pas... La mer est pleine de microbes, mais tellement dilués qu'ils sont inoffensifs... P : C'est ça... La mer, c'est de la merde homéopathique ! > > Oh God. > > Ask a reasonable question, get a fuckmook replying with a adolescent answer. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > little in the many doom community web sites. If you can't search it by > yourself... damn you won't survive 2 seconds in Doom 3. worthless reply to a worthless question...... > Oh God. > Ask a reasonable question, get a fuckmook replying with a adolescent answer. > Only Adults (Mentally) need reply. I am an adult, and you, sir, are a whining showoff. Clearly your computer is adequate for the task. Now piss off and go play outside for a while. Matt Listen Matt, you silly little boy. Unlike most sad first-person shooter geeks, I do have a life outside doom. (I of course mean no disrespect to Doom) However, I cannot see what is wrong in asking a newsgroup dedicated to this subject to see if my spec is adequate. Yes I could find the spec with a bit of surfing but I made the Fatal! mistake by thinking that there might be helpful people in this group. Clearly I over-estimated the fuckwitt element here because I had only 2 sensible answers (thanks for them guys) Next time I take leave of my senses and decide to gather info from this primary group, I will act like a spotty, ginger, goofy virgin who has never seen a real woman before so I blend in nicely with the geek element here so I might get the desired info. Stan > > Oh God. > > Ask a reasonable question, get a fuckmook replying with a adolescent [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Now piss off and go play outside for a while. > Matt >Listen Matt, you silly little boy. Unlike most sad first-person shooter >geeks, I do have a life outside doom. (I of course mean no disrespect to >Doom) However, I cannot see what is wrong in asking a newsgroup dedicated to >this subject to see if my spec is adequate. Nothing wrong at all, except that the original poster in this exact thread had already posted essentially the same question, and received two responses with links to the recommended spec. >Yes I could find the spec with a bit of surfing but I made the Fatal! >mistake by thinking that there might be helpful people in this group. >Clearly I over-estimated the fuckwitt element here because I had only >2 sensible answers (thanks for them guys) Helpful answers had already been posted by the time you made your post. I know that article propagation sometimes takes a while, and so they might not have been visible on your news server at the time, but I can't see how you thought it made sense to follow up to someone's post to ask the same question again. >Next time I take leave of my senses and decide to gather info from this >primary group, I will act like a spotty, ginger, goofy virgin who has never >seen a real woman before so I blend in nicely with the geek element here so >I might get the desired info. My, how mature you are. To sum up: you posted a stupid question and got one humorous response and two helpful ones. Usenet being the rather... umm... rambunctious place that it is, I think you were doing pretty well, at least until you started whinging about someone daring to make a joke. Rayner SignatureThe e-mail address in the headers is a spam trap. To reply by e-mail, please use: usenet (at) magic-cookie.co.uk Drop dead & end the threads. Stan's last response. > >Listen Matt, you silly little boy. Unlike most sad first-person shooter > >geeks, I do have a life outside doom. (I of course mean no disrespect to [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > Rayner What! Why is Stan <iembracethedead@yahoo.co.uk> here?? All these interruptions are enough to make one insane!! > Listen Matt, you silly little boy. Unlike most sad first-person > shooter geeks, I do have a life outside doom. (I of course mean no [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > who has never seen a real woman before so I blend in nicely with the > geek element here so I might get the desired info. Nothing wrong with being a virgin. :P EB, waiting for the right person Signature"FREEZE MUTHA-STICKER, THIS IS A f.ck-UP!!" EvilBill - http://www.evilbill.co.uk My Quake2 FTP site: ftp://65.30.181.223/quake2/EvilBill/ >What! Why is Stan <iembracethedead@yahoo.co.uk> here?? All these >interruptions are enough to make one insane!! [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > >EB, waiting for the right person That's true! But his sister was just so darn persistent. ;-) What! Why is Stan <iembracethedead@yahoo.co.uk> here?? All these interruptions are enough to make one insane!! > I have a Radion 9700Pro with 2.4g P4 & 512 DDR. > Will that be enough to run Doom III? > > Thanks in anticipation Yeah, that'll be fine. Check www.doom3portal.com for system reqs as released by id :) Signature"FREEZE MUTHA-STICKER, THIS IS A f.ck-UP!!" EvilBill - http://www.evilbill.co.uk My Quake2 FTP site: ftp://65.30.181.223/quake2/EvilBill/ Consider buying another 512 megs of ram. > I have a Radion 9700Pro with 2.4g P4 & 512 DDR. > Will that be enough to run Doom III? > > Thanks in anticipation > > Stan |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.