Hey! Spammers and crosspotters:

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

hmmm! - 17 Apr 2008 05:28 GMT

I think that the goal you were aiming for is reach.
Mickey is not posting anymore here.
You were suppose to leave then.
So, your word worth sh.t or what ?

Any coherent explanation ?

Louis

Reply to this Message

Polarhound - 17 Apr 2008 05:43 GMT

> I think that the goal you were aiming for is reach.
> Mickey is not posting anymore here.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Louis

Those would have all been here no matter what.

As always, Mickey never leaves for good -- He only changes his nicks for
a while until he thinks the coast is clear.

When he comes back, everyone will be waiting to give him what is deserved.

Reply to this Message

~misfit~ - 17 Apr 2008 11:20 GMT

Somewhere on teh intarweb "Polarhound" typed:

>> I think that the goal you were aiming for is reach.
>> Mickey is not posting anymore here.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> When he comes back, everyone will be waiting to give him what is
> deserved.

You sound like some little playground bully who's got a bunch of other
bullies to back him up. And yet you denied any involvement in this.

You're a pathetic little w.nker and you've nym-shifted yet again to escape
my killfile.

Easilly fixed. <plonk>

Signature

Shaun.

Reply to this Message

Graz - 17 Apr 2008 13:46 GMT

>Somewhere on teh intarweb "Polarhound" typed:
>>> I think that the goal you were aiming for is reach.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
>Easilly fixed. <plonk>

Shut up, Shorn, you bootlicking boghopper a.shole!

Reply to this Message

Graz - 17 Apr 2008 06:30 GMT

>I think that the goal you were aiming for is reach.

Not yet.

>Mickey is not posting anymore here.

Not at the moment, except occasionally as "maxterry".

>You were suppose to leave then.

Who said that?

>So, your word worth sh.t or what ?

No, your group is worth sh.t.

>Any coherent explanation ?

Wait and see!

Reply to this Message

royls@telus.net - 18 Apr 2008 00:37 GMT

>I think that the goal you were aiming for is reach.
>Mickey is not posting anymore here.
>You were suppose to leave then.
>So, your word worth sh.t or what ?
>
>Any coherent explanation ?

The explanation is that they're griefers. It wouldn't matter if
Mickey had never posted here. It's not about this group or even about
Mickey. It's about them. They've decided to vandalize this group, as
they vandalize other groups, simply because it makes them feel better
about how small their... minds are.

Of course, "minds"! What did you think I was going to say?

-- Roy L

Reply to this Message

hmmm! - 18 Apr 2008 05:19 GMT

On 17 avr, 19:37, ro...@telus.net wrote:

> The explanation is that they're griefers. It wouldn't matter if
> Mickey had never posted here. It's not about this group or even about
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> -- Roy L

Saddly Roy, i think your are totally right.
They seems to be little pricks without any kind of judgement.
Easy enough to see the absolute lack of constructive consciousness in
their way to act. But, hey!, Internet has is good and bad aspect.
Things here are in balance. And, if vandalizing this NG is making them
feel better, i'll rather live my life then theirs.

" Of course, "minds"! What did you think I was going to say?"

Oh! I thought that you were talking about how small is the number of
people that are not laughing in their back in real life.... Because
the ridiculous behavior they are showing here must have reflections
out of Usenet ! (Unless they spend all their time with people like
them, wich, IMO is as positive as eating their own sh.t...Bon
appetit!!).

Louis

Reply to this Message