Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Platforms
PCXboxPlayStationNintendo
Games
ActionStrategyRole Playing GamesSimulatorsSport Games

Game Forum / Role Playing Games / Diablo 2 / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Usenet glitch ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
hmmm! - 25 Apr 2007 05:48 GMT
No post for 16 hours !

Something is wrong.

The old fascist dream: I'll control the world...
Easier then ever right now : Control internet !

Internet beeing our collective soul, who will be our next pope/iman/
shaman/ after Google ?

Maybe there will be no "after Google" !

(or just, maybe, no one posted since late morning and i am just there,
paranoing about Mr. Google...)

Louis
ArtDent - 25 Apr 2007 16:21 GMT
> No post for 16 hours !

Sorry mate, I think we were all busy actually playing the game for a
change instead of just talking about it. ;)

> Something is wrong.

Yes, yes, we know.  There are still a few monsters left alive!!!
Your mission, should you decide to accept it, is to go find and kill them
all.
This post will not self-destruct in sixty seconds, but we can pretend if
we want to.

Signature

Don't Panic!

Mark (newsgroups) - 25 Apr 2007 16:35 GMT
>> No post for 16 hours !
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> This post will not self-destruct in sixty seconds, but we can pretend if
> we want to.

I've caught it before it destructed!

But Louis, I think it's google groups that has the problems. I've had to
switch to a free usenet server that allows posting. It's actually good
to be using a proper client again, but you can't deny the convenience of
google groups.

I'm guessing you won't see this message anyway until the problem has
been fixed ;-)

Can anyone else see this?
Patrick Vervoorn - 25 Apr 2007 16:44 GMT
[snippage, can't comment on Google Groups not doing what it's supposed to
do..]

>Can anyone else see this?

No problemo.

Regards,

Patrick.
Mark (newsgroups) - 25 Apr 2007 16:50 GMT
> [snippage, can't comment on Google Groups not doing what it's supposed to
> do..]
>
>> Can anyone else see this?
>
> No problemo.

Thanks and good. I think I'll stick to using a proper client for a
while.  Thunderbird seems pretty decent so far and hopefully the nntp
server I'm using is stable.
hmmm! - 27 Apr 2007 05:05 GMT
On Apr 25, 11:35 am, "Mark (newsgroups)" <marknewsgro...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> But Louis, I think it's google groups that has the problems. I've had to
> switch to a free usenet server that allows posting. It's actually good
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Can anyone else see this?

You were right; it was google groups that was shaky.
I always liked the easy access to google groups, but maybe i should
switch to a more performant client. What is the free one you are
talking about?

Louis
neithskye - 27 Apr 2007 16:07 GMT
> You were right; it was google groups that was shaky.

Google Groups still seems to be having problems. My posts, which I'm
accustomed to seeing shorly after I hit "Send", are still taking hours
to appear.

--
Jill
Mark (newsgroups) - 27 Apr 2007 17:12 GMT
> On Apr 25, 11:35 am, "Mark (newsgroups)" <marknewsgro...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> switch to a more performant client. What is the free one you are
> talking about?

I'm using Mozilla Thunderbird as a client and connecting to aioe.cjb.net
 as a news server. No idea how long these free news servers stay up
though. Thunderbird is a decent client, but I'm a little concerned about
it's text wrap option, I'm not sure it's working correctly.
Mark - 25 Apr 2007 16:37 GMT
> No post for 16 hours !
>
> Something is wrong.

Al Gore is performing maintenance on his creation.

Regards-
Mark

Bongo Fury
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.