Still too much for a handheld gaming system. And I doubt it would be below
$200 US from reading its specs.
And I doubt people would like changing batteries every 3 hours.
> Still too much for a handheld gaming system. And I doubt it would be
> below $200 US from reading its specs.
Doesn't matter. The price will come down.
> And I doubt people would like changing batteries every 3 hours.
Don't see why they'd need to.
Scott - 28 Jan 2004 06:30 GMT
> > Still too much for a handheld gaming system. And I doubt it would be
> > below $200 US from reading its specs.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Don't see why they'd need to.
I personally would not pay more than what a used PS2 costs, but thats just
one mans' opinion.
Joe Ottoson - 28 Jan 2004 23:18 GMT
>> > Still too much for a handheld gaming system. And I doubt it would
>> > be below $200 US from reading its specs.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I personally would not pay more than what a used PS2 costs, but thats
> just one mans' opinion.
I just want to play games. I don't consider something somehow innately
less valueable just because it's portable.
> Still too much for a handheld gaming system. And I doubt it would be below
> $200 US from reading its specs.
Sure it will, after it bombs like the CD-i and the Virtual Boy.

Signature
"It's the 21st. Century, but where are the flying cars?
"There are no flying cars.
"I was promised flying cars."
Avery Brooks, IBM commercial
Sinbad_EV - 28 Jan 2004 14:23 GMT
Dude, I wish I had a CD-i... then I could play the lost Zelda game...
SEV
> > Still too much for a handheld gaming system. And I doubt it would be
> below
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> "I was promised flying cars."
> Avery Brooks, IBM commercial
> Still too much for a handheld gaming system.
http://news.gaminghorizon.com/media/1074787953.html
"Some additional Nintendo news bits have hit the web this morning, foremost
among them the news that the Nintendo DS - previously announced here - will
cost an approximate $187 USD"
Even if the PSP is $50 or $75 more, I think you'll find a lot of people
willing to pay that for a device that plays true next-gen handheld games and
acts as an all-in-one media player, as opposed to a dual-screened niche
market toy with virtually no developer support behind it.
> And I doubt people would like changing batteries every 3 hours.
Your ill-informed belief that the PSP will need to be recharged (it likely
won't even have removable batteries) every three hours is about as valuable
and useful as the sh.t I just took.
BTW, your "line up" of developers backing the DS is holding steady at
exactly one, with EA saying they may not even bother with the stupid thing:
http://www.gamespot.com/all/news/news_6087083.html
Looks like the N-Gage might have some company.
-Z-
Sinbad_EV - 28 Jan 2004 14:30 GMT
I have this feeling that the next GameBoy will be out by 2006 anyways...
though I comletely agree that the PSP will blow the DS out of the water, if
not the GBA, GameCube and X-box... meh... Sony just has too much electronics
experience to compare... I love my Cube to death, but if N doesn't put out
they might as well start looking into becoming third party... but I think
they WILL put out... and put out big... so yeah
SEV
> > Still too much for a handheld gaming system.
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> -Z-
Eiji Hayashi - 28 Jan 2004 15:09 GMT
Have you started to warm up to the PSP now Zackman? a couple of months
ago you weren't too keen on its chances.
> > Still too much for a handheld gaming system.
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> -Z-
if it has a TV out and I can play DVDs on it and their is an extra contoller
port that would be able to use a 4way adapet... I'm in...
SEV
> Still too much for a handheld gaming system. And I doubt it would be below
> $200 US from reading its specs.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> >
> > I'll buy a PSP for $200 or even $250